Green New Scam Is Dying

Guest Post by Jim Rickards

It’s no secret that the vast majority of the so-called elites are advocates of climate alarmism and are taken in by the Green New Scam.

Whether this preference is based on ignorance of the science, ideological zeal, a willful desire to hurt American growth or simple greed because of their investments in Green New Scam infrastructure varies case by case.

The typical upper-income supporter of the climate cult including academics, media figures and celebrities is probably ignorant of the fact that there is no evidence that CO2 emissions cause climate change and that the real causes are solar cycles, volcanoes, ocean currents and atmospheric moisture not caused by humans.

Climate Alarmists Have It Backward

The historical record actually demonstrates that warming periods produce higher CO2 levels — not the other way around. CO2 doesn’t cause warming. It’s caused by natural warming.

In other words, climate alarmists have causation completely backward.

Climate alarmism is based almost entirely on computer models, which depend on the inputs the modelers themselves build into them. A model is only as good as the inputs and assumptions programmed into it.

Virtually every one of these models has overestimated warming, sometimes by orders of magnitude, because it’s based on faulty assumptions that overestimate the impact of CO2 on climate.

In other words, it’s junk science. But they keep relying on these models because their political agenda requires it.

Climate: The New Communism

There’s no doubt that a fair number of neo-Marxists embrace the climate scam because they know it damages U.S. industry, raises costs to U.S. consumers and helps to undermine the U.S. economy.

Following the end of the Cold War and the collapse of communism, anti-capitalistic collectivists admitted that they needed to promote the climate agenda because the only way to combat global warming is through collective action. It requires a coordinated global effort that limits national sovereignty.

The neo-Marxists are impervious to evidence; they just want to hurt America and wasting money on windmills instead of building new refineries is a good way to do it. That leaves the greed crowd.

The Real “Green” in the Green Agenda

They’re early investors in windmills, solar modules, lithium car batteries, EVs, charging stations, carbon credits and other infrastructure of the climate scam. They stand to make billions of dollars off the narrative with help from extravagant government subsidies.

They don’t really care if it all collapses in the end (which it will) as long as they get rich at taxpayer expense in the meantime. All of this behavior is clear as far as it goes. What is not clear is the extent to which the Green New Scammers are doing this with your money.

The best example is multibillionaire Larry Fink, who runs the giant BlackRock investment fund. Fink has been aggressive in promoting the climate scam along with racial quotas, DEI and defunding police.

He’s entitled to his opinions. But is he entitled to pursue his radical agenda with pension fund money from conservative states and institutions? Fortunately, a backlash has begun against Fink and his fellow wokesters.

More state pension fund managers are beginning to pull their funds from BlackRock and other investment managers that pursue far-left policies not in the best interests of their beneficiaries. This backlash may not change Larry Fink’s lifestyle. But over time, it might change the world for the better.

The EV Sham

A major part of the climate agenda includes electric vehicles (EVs). I’ve been warning for years that EVs aren’t feasible as a transportation solution for more than relatively few Americans and that they are little more than glorified golf carts despite the $70,000-and-up price tags.

In the first place, EVs don’t cut carbon emissions. The car itself does not have emissions, but it’s charged with electricity from power plants that do.

The batteries are made with poisonous chemicals and metals including lithium, cobalt, copper and nickel that come from mining operations that use enormous amounts of water and electricity to extract the needed materials.

It takes thousands of tons of ore to extract enough critical minerals to make one battery. EVs don’t take a charge in extreme cold, and the batteries can’t hold a charge. Travel range is grossly overstated for many reasons, including the fact that EV car heaters drain the batteries (with internal-combustion engines, ICEs, the engine makes heat which can easily be directed into the car to keep passengers comfortable with no additional energy required).

Resale values of EVs are close to zero because buyers of used EVs have to shell out $25,000 or more for new batteries after the vehicle is about seven years old. The list of drawbacks goes on.

Most Americans have resisted EVs because they understand the disadvantages. But many Americans were drawn to the false promise of emission-free transportation and other ridiculous claims by the Green New Scammers. Now even the most committed EV buyers are waking up.

I Want My ICE Car Back

A new survey by consulting firm McKinsey and Co. shows that 29% of EV owners in nine major economies want to return to ICE vehicles. When the sample is narrowed to just the U.S., 46% of those surveyed want to return to ICEs.

The McKinsey officials who conducted the survey claim to be “surprised” by those results. That probably says something about the fact that McKinsey experts are just as deluded about EVs as the buyers surveyed.

When breaking down the results, 45% say EVs are too expensive, 33% say they have charging concerns and 29% are concerned about the limited driving range.

The truth is that the EV was invented in 1837 and reached the peak of its popularity in 1910 just before the mass production of internal-combustion cars by Henry Ford. The American public got it right when they flocked to the Model T.

It sounds like they’re getting it right again after a brief infatuation with the false promise of the EV. The bottom line is that the Green New Scam is falling apart.

It can’t happen soon enough.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
July 3, 2024 2:57 pm

They lost. People see that it’s all for control.

” The origin of the environmental movement began in 1968 when the Club Of Rome was formed. The Club Of Rome has been described as a crisis think-tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think-tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called The First Global Revolution, authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, on Pages 104-105, it stated, “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers of course will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response.”

Better still , the cabal is clearly worried the plebes won’t fall in line as told to.

A threat from a common enemy may no longer unite polarized Americans, study suggests

A threat from a common enemy may no longer unite polarized Americans, study suggests | Haas News | Berkeley Haas

The ‘ external threat ‘ con also included UFO’s as an excuse to obliterate nation states in favor of a global government. ( Report From Iron Mountain ). When Gort lands on the WH lawn , everyone is going to point and laugh…. FAKE & GAY !

Philbert Desanex
Philbert Desanex
  Anonymous
July 3, 2024 3:15 pm

I don’t think it’s totally about control. Many of those at the top of the pyramid, Albert A. Gore Jr. being the most notorious example, are making a killing by front-running investments in all of these government subsidized/supported green companies and start-ups. It’s classic insider-investing.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Philbert Desanex
July 3, 2024 3:22 pm

True in part , short term, but when the insane megalomaniacs have all the money they still hunger for power.

Slippery Bob
Slippery Bob
  Philbert Desanex
July 4, 2024 6:41 am

Control and accumulation of wealth, are mutually inclusive and codependent, you can’t achieve one without the other, at the end of the day they amount to the same thing.

algore ? goldman-sucks employee to this day
algore ? goldman-sucks employee to this day
  Philbert Desanex
July 4, 2024 7:23 pm

“In 1988, Leonard Kleinrock presented Congress with an idea for a National Research Network. Al Gore was curious. He had been interested in the topic since the early 1970’s and had initiated a study in the Senate on June 24, 1986, the Supercomputer Network Study Act of 1986. Over the next three years, Gore developed a bill that would lead to the National Information Infrastructure, the information superhighway, and the Internet. The High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991 passed on December 9, 1991.
The controversy emerged about whether Al Gore claimed invention of the Internet, which he did not. During a 1999 interview when running for President, Gore remarked … “During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country’s economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.” That’s actually accurate. He took the initiative to present and eventually pass the bill that led to its creation.”
1969 Detail, Arpanet, forerunner to the Internet, Founded

Tlate
Tlate
July 3, 2024 3:04 pm

Now you have thieves cutting the EV cables from charging stations for the copper in them. (Story on Zerohedge)You can’t make this stuff up. Guess all those unattended EV charging stations were not such a great idea after all.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Tlate
July 3, 2024 3:19 pm

Coffee & A Mike podcast on Rumble. K-9 Reaper South Africa security guy says this is coming big time as it is there.

Look at that , vid banned.

410 Video is not found

k9_reaper | T.I.A on X: “As of tomorrow, it’s officially been 30 years of “freedom” in South Africa. https://t.co/tuZmNmn1ES” / X

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
July 3, 2024 3:27 pm
Anonymous
Anonymous
July 3, 2024 3:08 pm

Fuck the governments of the world that on one hand cry about the environment while being the largest polluters of all.

Official D.O.D. policy re; nuclear waste is : ” The solution to pollution is dilution. ”
Hanford Wa. and , Savanah River, SC. and other sites leak like crazy , meh just keep flooding it with water.

DID YOU DRINK THE WATER AT CAMP LEJUNE ?

You may be eligible for compensation.

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 3, 2024 4:11 pm

“The environmental crisis is the cornerstone for the New World Order”

Maurice strong ( U.N. environmental leader ) was quoted as saying, ” Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Batshit crazy, they are.

“Another reason why the environment is such an important issue to Gorbachev is that it will enable him to introduce and ratify comprehensive international treaties granting unprecedented power to seize government and private property all in the name of protecting the environment. In fact, Gorbachev’s mandate for the future includes the imposition of stringent global environmental laws which would regulate every area of life. Toward this end he has been supporting the creation of an all-encompassing planetary document called The Earth Charter. Gary Kah The Enviromental Agenda.

And you thought communism stopped and Gorbachev went away after the Berlin Wall came down.

[Conspiracy-Theory-Politics] OVER 100 NWO QUOTES–QUOTES FROM PEOPLE WHO CONSIDER US “SUBJECTS”

Mark Sivad
Mark Sivad
July 3, 2024 5:23 pm

Super efficent small 4×4 DIESEL pickup

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Mark Sivad
July 4, 2024 12:42 am

If they were serious, they’d be pursuing biodiesel made from algae, grown in waste water.

It’s a viable fuel, it’s cheaper than electric by at least a order of magnitude, it requires no expensive minerals, requires no massive upgrades to infrastructure, and it’s decentralized.

Slippery Bob
Slippery Bob
  Anonymous
July 4, 2024 6:50 am

What they’re really serious about is replacing old technologies new high-tech technologies, that offer high yield investment opportunities, which is why the expensive minerals and massive upgrades solutions are heavily promoted, and the cheap low tech solutions are suppressed.

BL
BL
July 3, 2024 5:35 pm

42% of EV owners want to go back to gas powered vehicles. They say they are burned out on the whole mess, waiting for and finding a charge. The expense was brutal in the long run.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  BL
July 4, 2024 12:43 am

Wait until they try to unload those electric millstones as used cars.

Near zero resale value.

KaD
KaD
July 3, 2024 5:35 pm
Lee Harvey Griswald
Lee Harvey Griswald
July 3, 2024 8:07 pm

comment image

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Lee Harvey Griswald
July 4, 2024 12:44 am

OH CRAP, GLOBAL COOLING IS HERE!!11!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
July 4, 2024 7:19 am

The next Ice Age is overdue.

rhs jr
rhs jr
July 3, 2024 11:36 pm

I know that Doppler Radar can operate in a mode that will cause water vapor to precipitate somehow. I suppose it ionizes something in the atmosphere and that ion acts like a charged particle in a laboratory bubble chamber, and forms a droplet of water. I am suggesting that some radars and cell towers, etc, could “seed clouds” and create or intensify storms , which would dry the atmosphere, and create a large high pressure “heat dome” over the USA. The clear sky would let solar energy pour down to heat the ground and cause Global Warming, like Urban Heat Islands and deserts do. This High Pressure Area effect would exist until Hurricanes broke up the Heat Dome. Note that the USA High Pressure winds would deflect many hurricanes away from the USA and into Mexico.

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 4, 2024 7:22 am

Go outside and stand in the sun on a cool 40 degree day. You can feel the sun burning your skin, which only happened when it was 90 in the past. Obviously the sun, not the air is the difference. The sun is in a weird phase, which is why they are so worried about the solar flares shutting down communications. My guess is there are increases in both ultraviolet and radiant light coming from the sun.

rhsjr
rhsjr
  Anonymous
July 4, 2024 8:10 am

The Sun is entering its’ 11 year Solar Maximum now, predicted to peak July 2025.

anonymous 2
anonymous 2
  Anonymous
July 5, 2024 10:04 am

That’s always been the case and has nothing to do with any unique sun phase. The irradiance from the sun on earth is about 1000 Watts per square meter. But it can be higher or lower depending on air quality as poor air quality and/or clouds tend to scatter a lot of the radiation . So on a cool crisp autumn day with no clouds and low humidity, it can feel more intense. By the same token, it feels a lot cooler under a shade tree in the summer because that 1000 watts of flux isn’t hitting you directly.

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 4, 2024 7:49 am

I wonder what proof Rickards has that there has been any warming.

Note to self: when in a debate, always start by uncritically accepting the other side’s unproven presumptions.