GOVERNMENT & MEDIA RIDICULE

Historians Confirm Karl Marx Was Employed By The Rothschilds

Historians have confirmed that Karl Marx was not only related to the Rothschilds, but was also employed as their agent in order to subvert democracy and corrupt the Socialist movement.

Karl Marx was born in a London squalor, and came from a long line of rabbis.

Henrymakow.com reports: He used to visit the Red Lion Pub at Great Windmill Street, Soho where he and Friedrich Engels were asked to write what became the Communist Manifesto. His best known work is the book Das Kapital, which fails to mention that money is printed out of thin air and by his cousins, the Rothschilds.

https://archive.is/rjILr#selection-679.0-691.304

Nitazene is the New Fentanyl in China’s Silent War on America

The bloodbath in America from Fentanyl is staggering, but because there are no bombs or missiles landing on American territory, many just step over the bodies in Kensington or Mission Street and go on with their lives not making the connection. But now there is a new and more powerful insecticide: Nitazene

Just reading through the comments from yesterday’s Anonymous Conservative, and found one that definitely seems worth reposting.

On Chevron….

This one is huge, and is probably even a bigger deal than Fischer in the long term. This is going to effect essentially everything some alphabet regulator has done since 1985. All the EPA bullshit, all the BATF bullshit, all the NTSB bullshit in cars, the BLM regulations on ranchers, all of it is now up for review by the courts, the courts are instructed NOT to just assume that agency knows what it is talking about, but to do their jobs.

phelps
21 hours ago

SCOTUS opinions was a big day.
Biggest was Fischer, the J6 case. Like a lot of people (including me) were saying from the start, the “obstructing an official proceeding” charge was on an Sarbanes Oxley law, and it was about Enron document shredding. It made it a felony to shred documents to cover your crimes. There is an “otherwise impeding” clause in it, and the prosecutors tried to drive a truck through that. The SCOTUS just shit on that truck and lit it on fire.

SCOTUS holds that the law (18 USC 1512) applies to documents. Duh. The ‘otherwise’ has to tie to documents somehow, and the example they gave is that someone might forge evidence rather than destroy it. It does NOT cover things like, some folks took tours of Congress and this made gin-soaked Pelosi weep London Dry in a simulacrum of tears and kept Congress from voting. SCOTUS has reversed and remanded (meaning it goes back down to the original court) and instructed the court to follow its narrower ruling, meaning that the charges are either going to be dropped or dismissed.

If I remember correctly, this is the VAST majority of the felony charges on the J6 defendants, and other than a few violent assholes, everyone else just has misdemeanors other than this.

The Loper Bright case is also huge. Short version: The Chevron doctrine is dead, dead, dead. Chevron held that if Congress was open-ended or ambiguous on the powers that it gave a federal agency, the the courts had to just take that agency’s word on how much power Congress gave it. It sounds incredibly stupid when you say it like that, because it was that stupid.

This one is huge, and is probably even a bigger deal than Fischer in the long term. This is going to effect essentially everything some alphabet regulator has done since 1985. All the EPA bullshit, all the BATF bullshit, all the NTSB bullshit in cars, the BLM regulations on ranchers, all of it is now up for review by the courts, the courts are instructed NOT to just assume that agency knows what it is talking about, but to do their jobs.

   Chevron is overruled. Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, as the APA requires. Careful attention to the judgment of the Executive Branch may help inform that inquiry. And when a particular statute delegates authority to an agency consistent with constitutional limits, courts must respect the delegation, while ensuring that the agency acts within it. But courts need not and under the APA may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.

Last opinion released would be the big opinion on any other day, but the two above are huge. Grants Pass v Johnson is about an anti-camping law. These are essentially vagrancy laws, preventing bums from setting up shanties and ramshackle hovels in their hobo jungles in the middle of town. Pro-hobo activists claimed that these laws are Cruel and Unusual Punishment because it makes being a poor a crime.

SCOTUS called bullshit, especially since the plaintiffs themselves were “homeless” only because they wouldn’t go to the town shelter, where they had to smoke outside and not be drunk. Anti-camping laws now have full effect again (which also applies to Texas, which makes me happy that the police have to do something about the hobo jungle down the street from me.)

Here again, we witness a man who shits his pants (the ones where the waistline is worn ridiculously high, just below his titties), who has no business, or righteous standing in the halls of D.C. power.

A cotton face mask that does nothing to stop viruses kicked his ass, as he struggled to take it off past his glasses, in another viral clip.

Debate fake and gay ?

LOOK UFO’s in Canada !

Large sun-like UFOs spotted in Canada: ‘We’re seeing aliens’ – Insider Paper