Doug Casey on How the Climate Hysteria Is Lowering Your Standard of Living

Via International Man

International Man: The carbon hysteria extends far beyond oil and gas companies.

One overlooked area is household appliances.

Politicians are implementing increasingly stringent regulations for dishwashers, washing machines, and other appliances. There have even been reports of a desire to phase out gas stoves.

What’s your take on all of this?

Doug Casey: As Der Schwabenklaus of the World Economic Forum boldly said some years ago, “You’ll own nothing and be happy.”

The fact that a prominent figure could actually say that, promote the idea, and not be pilloried gives you an idea of the spirit of the current century. The lack of outrage from the average man is even more sick than the idea itself.

Not owning appliances is a practical application of the meme, but just one tentacle of the global warming octopus. Appliances are constructed from resources that have to be mined and run with electricity; that makes them evil. It’s much more important in these people’s views to “save the planet”—a ridiculous concept—than to continue raising the standard of living.

The fact is that the self-righteous authoritarians who want to limit the use of appliances basically just hate people—especially middle-class people. They’d really like to revert to pre-capitalist times, when only the upper classes, the feudal aristocrats, could benefit from conveniences.

Ecowarriors, the Greens, are cut from the same cloth as socialists, communists, and fascists. Their totem fruit is the watermelon, green on the outside and red on the inside.

International Man: Many people have noticed that modern appliances are not the same quality as the ones produced decades ago. For one thing, modern appliances tend to require much more time to do the same thing an older model could do faster.

For example, today, it’s common to see a standard dish-washing cycle to take more than two hours.

Modern appliances also don’t perform as well and break down more frequently. Climate regulations are largely to blame for this regression.

What is really going on here?

Doug Casey: I don’t have a lot of personal experience with how appliances work, but I’ve certainly heard that modern appliances are designed to sacrifice convenience and time in order to possibly use less water or electricity.

One thing that I do recall is that several decades ago, the US government decided to regulate the amount of water that could be used to flush toilets. The devices are now less sanitary and often have to be flushed twice. The idea that politicians should mandate plumbing designs is absurd. But they do this with all products—cars, planes, houses, you name it. They destroy capital and slow technological progress, even while annoying and frustrating engineers.

But perhaps the average person doesn’t think about these things or care. The standard of living has gone up for so long that we tend to think it’s automatic and divinely ordained. I’m not so sure about that. Everything tends to wind down unless there is enough outside force to counteract it.

For instance, we live in a throwaway society. If you need something repaired, it’s generally more economic to throw the whole thing away than to hire a skilled craftsman to fix it, even though they barely exist anymore, and they’re very expensive. It’s often cheaper to replace things that break.

Is that truly economic or not? I’m not sure, but we can see it even with houses. Once upon a time, houses were built to last 100 years or longer. They were a major capital investment. But now, they seem to be the residential equivalent of IKEA furniture. They’re disposable assets. But who cares if you’re renting or have a large mortgage?

I can understand how a “throwaway” mentality might be a good thing, even though it seems wasteful, simply because technology improves. Out with the old, in with the “new and improved.” Most changes make electricity, plumbing and insulation more economic. Who wants old stuff when technology can give you new stuff that works better? The problem, however, might be that new appliances are expensive and often financed. Your standard of living might go up in the short run but further down in the long run as you deal with debt.

A case can be made for everything being bulldozed after 50 or 100 years—a cycle of life argument. You may want to keep an old car for sentimental reasons, but newer cars really do work better. Although you’ll probably have to finance the thing over seven years since they’re so expensive. Or lease it, turning a minor asset into a perpetual liability. And if it breaks, you can forget about trying to fix it yourself, if only because of its thousands of computer chips. The same is true with most devices.

There are reasons to hate appliances and devices even while you need or even love them. But I prefer to make the decision, not some government official. It’s a moral question, not a technical question.

International Man: Governments present so-called “green” solutions as a step forward to the future.

However, in many ways, they represent a big step backward.

What is your take?

Doug Casey: One currently fashionable indication of this is the 15-minute city, which governments are trying to impose all over the world. These would penalize you if you exit your designated 15-minute zone more than X number of times per month. The idea is green. And, like most green notions, it is very retrogressive. They want to return people to the status of medieval serfs, when few ventured more than 15 minutes from their hovels.

The most egregious green solutions, of course, involve spending trillions of dollars to build wind and solar facilities to generate electricity. There’s nothing wrong with using wind or solar power, but they only make sense for specific projects, usually in isolated locations under special conditions.

Wind and solar are totally unsuitable for running an industrial civilization. They’ve gotten much better over the years as technology has advanced, but they’re still more the product of social engineering than mechanical or electrical engineering.

Electric vehicles are another example. As a lifelong car guy, I see advantages to EVs. They have very low centers of gravity, which, everything else being equal, makes them handle much better than equivalent internal combustion engine cars. They have many fewer moving parts, which adds to reliability and efficiency. They’re quieter, emissions-free on the road, and lightning-fast. These are big pluses.

But on the downside, they’re a nightmare when it’s too cold or too hot; temperature extremes drain batteries, and it’s still quite inconvenient to charge them. That’s assuming the huge extra load they entail doesn’t cause the whole “sustainable” wind/solar grid to collapse.

Of course, battery technology will improve, so they may yet fulfill their promise. But in the meantime, when the lithium battery needs replacement, you might as well junk the car. Plus, they tend to be ultra-expensive to repair if you’re in a fender bender and potentially quite dangerous under certain conditions.

Unless I either want a high-performance plaything or was in an ideal environment where I’m just using it locally, EVs don’t currently make much sense.

In fact, almost all “green” solutions are uneconomic, counterproductive, and even destructive.

International Man: The rise of carbon hysteria has coincided with rising inflation.

For example, the average person might typically be expected to be upset by a drastic rise in meat or energy prices.

But his anger is muted and misdirected by the media, academia, Hollywood, and politicians telling him that his reduced standard of living is somehow helping save the planet. It seems like the carbon hysteria is a mass campaign to gaslight people into accepting a lowering of their standard of living.

What is your view on the relationship between inflation and the carbon hysteria?

Doug Casey: Well, inflation is caused by money printing. The carbon hysteria will mostly be financed by money printing. So, there’s an indirect relationship. But it’s actually worse than that.

It’s long been said that war is the health of the State. We’re now looking at an insane war on carbon to supposedly save the planet. Carbon is not only the basis of all life, but CO2 levels are only marginally above what’s necessary to sustain plant life.

It’s genetically inbred in people to pull together during a war. The eco-hysterics ask: “What could be more important than a war to save the planet?” So, of course, thoughtless people will accept less and do what they’re told. In my view, this is all complete nonsense.

If they tell the plebs that inflation is somehow necessary to fight deadly CO2 and save the planet, then the average pleb will probably go along, since he’s got almost no knowledge of economics, and even less of science.

The planet will be just fine. It’s been here for 4.5 billion years and will be here for billions more, long after humanity has disappeared or gone elsewhere. Anyway, the climate hysterics don’t really care about “saving the planet”; even they aren’t quite that stupid. What’s going on is that they actually hate humanity. And themselves. The world is suffering from an episode of mass psychosis.

My reaction is to push against them wherever possible.

International Man: Where is the carbon hysteria trend headed? Have we hit the high water mark?

Doug Casey: Well, we have to look at both long-term and short-term trends.

The long-term trend—the ascent of man—has been in motion for at least 10,000 years. It’s been advancing exponentially with more scientific breakthroughs, leading to better technology and a higher standard of living. Will that trend stop? I’d like to think it will not only continue but accelerate.

But there have been counter trends within that very favorable long-term trend. The Bronze Age collapse around 1200 BC set civilization back for over 400 years. The fall of Roman civilization in the West led to the Dark Ages from roughly the fifth through the ninth centuries. Could we be on the cusp of something similar? There are plenty of reasons for concern. But let’s not engage in fear porn.

I hate to think something so dire is in the cards. But Dark Riders are at large, and the eye of Sauron is scanning the world. The tendency towards authoritarianism or even totalitarianism worldwide is growing—not to mention the possibility of World War III.

The negative trends go way beyond carbon hysteria and appliances that don’t work very well.

Editor’s Note: We’ve seen governments institute the strictest controls on people and businesses in history. It’s been a swift elimination of individual freedoms.

But this is just the beginning…

Most people don’t realize the terrible things that could come next, including negative interest rates, the abolition of cash, and much more.

If you want to know how to survive what the central bankers and the Deep State have planned, then you need to see this newly released report from legendary investor Doug Casey and his team.

Click here to download it now.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
June 12, 2024 8:03 am

And none of it is true:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/

Laura Ann
Laura Ann
  Anonymous
June 12, 2024 11:15 am

good website info. People are not buying E.V.s also the power grid wouldn’t handle it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Laura Ann
June 12, 2024 12:38 pm

Plus, energy generation is energy generation. It all comes from the same source.

Thorium salt nukes is a good way to help change things.

Tsquared
Tsquared
June 12, 2024 8:48 am

Not in Georgia. Plant Vogel put reactors 3 and 4 on-line in the past 16 months. Plant Hatch has plans for additional reactors.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Tsquared
June 12, 2024 8:59 am

Thorium salt

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Tsquared
June 13, 2024 8:54 am

If they used the windmills to elevate water into higher elevation reservoirs, they could generate energy on demand using water and gravity.
That’s what they should be doing with windmills.

TonyBaloney
TonyBaloney
June 12, 2024 9:11 am

My wife and I bought a new washer and dryer November 2022. We have a Maytag commercial technology washer that we have owned for about 15 years at our self service dog wash and it worked great. All that time, I replaced the clutch once. it primarily washes bath towels in large loads so it’s worked pretty well.

So when the time came to pick out a washer, we bought what I thought was the equivalent model. Maytag commercial technology top load washer with agitator. on its run, my wife washed a load of typical household, laundry, including jeans, etc. the end of the wash cycle, as my wife was removing the clothing from the washer, she noticed that the jeans and other items were still dry and had undissolved detergent powder still on them. Even though this was set up as a large load with extra wash and rinse cycle. We tried in a couple more times to see if this was a fluke, and when it continued to fail to wash properly, I went online to look at reviews for this particular model. What an eye-opening experience that was! My favorite was the person who stated I could get my clothes, wetter by spitting on them.

I contacted Lowe’s where I had purchased it and found out. They only had a 48 hour return policy which really pissed me off as I was needing to leave town for a week. I got a hold of the store manager and she agreed to take the obviously and essentially nonfunctioning wash back as long as I agreed to purchase the replacement from Lowe’s.

Finally selected a front load washer and explained to my wife that if they’re going to mandate at least the chances of the clothes being cycled through the water at the bottom of the drum and clean are better than a top load set up.

The really fouled up part is that what is being saved by not using a few gallons of water, but as stated in the article, the runtimes are two times longer or more? I don’t know how it breaks down, but it would seem to me that the extra electricity use would outweigh the extra water usage. Also, we seem to be running smaller loads of laundry more frequently so I’m sure in the end it’s up net loss energy wise.

From what I’m hearing, they’re doing this with all appliances.

delaville
delaville
  TonyBaloney
June 12, 2024 11:34 am

I looked for a machine where I could select the water levels. It ended up being a GE top loader and it wasn’t super expensive. It has many selections and options for soaking etc. with a very large capacity. It does a fine job.

Anonymous on my work phone
Anonymous on my work phone
  delaville
June 12, 2024 8:05 pm

The funny thing is the Maytag had all of those water level selectors, but they didn’t do a darn thing.

anonymous
anonymous
  Anonymous on my work phone
June 15, 2024 5:24 pm

The water level in most washers is set by a pressure switch. Sometimes these are diaphragm like old vacuum advance assemblies in cars, sometimes they are electronic. But they all function the same.

There is a tube connecting the switch to the bottom of the wash tub. As the water fills, the rising water puts pressure on the air in the tube, and the pressure sensor senses the pressure and shuts off the water when the pressure is correct.

A simple hack to get more water is to replace the original tube with a longer tube. It does not take much more than 1-3 inches to make a huge difference. If the tube is too long, the washer will overflow. But if it is a bit longer, then the washer will fill to a higher level.

Make the pressure tube a bit longer, and you’ll get higher water levels in your washer.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  TonyBaloney
June 12, 2024 2:11 pm

I have Kenmore heavy duty basic washer and dryer. 17 years old. Both work fantastic. Fuck buying new shit.

TheTruthBurns
TheTruthBurns
June 12, 2024 10:47 am

Governments LIE 24/7/365. Everything governments say is Bullshit – Never Trust Them – Ever. That’s All you need to know.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  TheTruthBurns
June 12, 2024 12:39 pm

Ergo, abolish the state.

Laura Ann
Laura Ann
June 12, 2024 11:12 am

I am still using appliances and no one is planning on swapping them out until they break down in this retirement community. Water heaters are 40 gal and do the job. People need to man up and just say no. Restaurant owners incl. who will continue to use gas ovens and ranges because they are more efficient for cooking for large groups. We are all electric and people won’t go out and buy expensive upgraded heat pumps either if theirs are working ok. We need real men to stand up against this BS. Landlords also need to resist this push for new heat pumps and anything else needed in rentals.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Laura Ann
June 12, 2024 12:41 pm

Resisters will always be chosen at random for punishment to push others into compliance.

VOWG
VOWG
  Anonymous
June 13, 2024 7:40 am

Then along with the no comes extreme action against those that would punish someone at random. Kill them.

VOWG
VOWG
  Laura Ann
June 13, 2024 7:39 am

Saying no and backing it up can be very effective.

Ursel Doran
Ursel Doran
June 12, 2024 11:53 am

“Carbon credits are merely a way for governments, central bankers, and their allies to control the populace and secure continued seigniorage as the fiat currency system flounders.  It’s the biggest scam since the indulgences of the Middle Ages.”

Carbon Credits Are the Biggest Scam Since Indulgences—How You Can Avoid Being Fleeced

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Ursel Doran
June 13, 2024 8:56 am

I claim all remaining carbon credits left behind by those who abandoned theirs after the Hokie Pokey.

Nimpcompoop
Nimpcompoop
June 12, 2024 1:06 pm

Yeah, it’s nothing but propaganda of the left to bring RUIN to capitalism. They feel some people having God’s blessing isn’t right and that we should all share the misery of backwards pagan societies.

VOWG
VOWG
June 13, 2024 7:36 am

People are stupid!