Below is David Galland's take on the fact that as of this Friday the US Government will no longer guarantee Money Market Funds. The key points are that the smart money is getting out of MM funds. Assets in these funds have declined by 15% in the last month. There is still $2 trillion in non-Treasury MM funds. Are you sure your MM fund is safe?
The 2nd more important point is that the Treasury is trying to force this money into the Big Banks. DO NOT LET IT HAPPEN. If you withdraw your money, put it in a local credit union or small bank in your community. DO NOT REWARD THE WHORING TARP BANKS. We need to make them fail for the good of the country.
What’s in YOUR Money Market Fund?
I noted with interest that Tim Geithner, the Goldman Sachs Secretary of the Treasury, has gone on record as saying that the government will withdraw its $3 trillion backstop guarantee from the money market fund industry, on schedule, this September 18.
While I am for any reduction in the government’s role in the economy, this decision is pretty interesting. Why would they do it now, when even a cursory examination of the real economy shows that things are shaky and rocking the boat on investor confidence seems a bit of a gamble?
In my usual, convoluted manner, I will try to answer that question, but only after stepping back to 2008 when I was told by a friend of mine in the most rarified air of high finance that he and all his peers had pulled all their cash out of money market mutual funds in March of 2008. They had done so because of the large quantities of suspect paper littering the portfolios of the funds, much of it anchored to commercial real estate and syndicated portfolios of consumer loans. As of mid-year 2008, 40% of outstanding corporate paper was held by money market mutual funds. The funds had taken on this paper as a way of trying to boost their yields and therefore gain a competitive advantage.
Another friend, an executive of a very large mutual fund company, confirmed that what lurked under the hood was ugly indeed.
In September of 2008, these concerns were made tangible when one of the largest U.S. money market funds, the Reserve MMF, “broke the buck.” Which is to say that the fund’s net asset value had fallen below the $1.00 benchmark that money market funds traditionally hold the line on. When the news broke, the public started heading to the exits, which is why the government had to step in with a deposit guarantee.
For the record, money market fund sponsors are under no real obligation to maintain a $1.00 NAV. Rather, that has become customary – a selling point, if you will – with the fund sponsors under no hard obligation to assure their NAVs don’t fall below that level. They hold the line at $1.00 because they know that it is very much in their interest – and the interest of their industry – to do so, even if that means they have to step up to the plate and provide the cash required to repair any holes in their balance sheets to avoid breaking the buck.
Interestingly, though breaking the buck is seen as something of a “black swan” event, it actually happens with great regularity. In fact, according to one study, over one-third of all money market funds have had their NAVs fall below $1.00 since July 2007. The only reason this news didn’t leak out to the public, causing the sort of run experienced by Reserve, was because the fund sponsors were able to quickly rush in with the necessary cash infusion.
Which brings us to September 18 and the expiration of the government’s guarantees.
While the money market funds have clearly reduced their exposure to the worst sort of paper, a fact you can see in the steep downward slope of their yields over the last couple of years – the higher the risk, the higher the yields – they are still sitting on huge chunks of risky paper.
Glance at the prospectus of your favorite money market fund, and you might find, as I just did by looking at that of one of the world’s largest money market funds, that 38% of the portfolio is made up of CDs issued by foreign banks, 9.9% in short-term corporate paper, and 12.3% in medium-term paper, much of it hitched to the fates of portfolios of car loans, insurance companies, and a variety of corporate entities.
In exchange for taking on that risk, you would have earned, so far in 2009, a yield of 0.55% on your money. Yes, just a hair over half of one percent. Of course, out of that handsome return, you’d have to pay your taxes, cutting the return well below even today’s purportedly reduced inflation levels.
As of September 2009, there was $3.58 trillion in money market mutual funds, of which just shy of $2 trillion is sitting in taxable non-government funds. But that money is starting to move: over the last month, money market mutual fund redemptions have been on the rise – with assets falling by a significant 15.3%. With the government pulling its guarantee, and given the risk associated with the money market funds, I have to wonder how many more investors might also decide to pick up stakes in the days and weeks just ahead?
And where might that all that money head? Most likely, given the cautious nature of money market fund holders, into FDIC-insured accounts and CDs, and into Treasury funds and instruments. That, of course, helps the banks, and it helps the government meet its aggressive funding needs, while simultaneously taking pressure off interest rates.
All of which may explain why the Treasury is pulling the plug on its money market fund guarantees. And, perhaps, in the process pulling the plug on the non-government money market funds.
I don’t have time to do the research here and now, but if you are aware of a money market fund sponsor that relies on its non-government money market funds for a sizable percentage of its income, they might make for an attractive shorting candidate.
Finally, I have a question for those of you who are parking money in taxable money market funds at this point, especially those that are not invested in Treasuries. And the question is this, “Are you out of your mind?”
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration said Thursday that a program used to guarantee as much as $3 trillion in money market mutual fund assets will end on schedule next week.
The program, which will be closed down on Sept. 18, had no direct cost to taxpayers and earned more than $1 billion in fees paid by the mutual fund industry, according to the Treasury Department.
It was established at the height of the financial crisis last fall after a large money market fund "broke the buck" — meaning the value of its underlying assets fell below $1 for each investor dollar put in.
Investors were exposed to losses after the Primary Reserve Fund conceded that $785 million it had invested in the debt of Lehman Brothers became worthless after the investment bank's bankruptcy in September 2008.
The funds are a mainstay of financial management for U.S. families and companies because they're viewed as safe and easily accessible investments that offer returns exceeding those of conventional savings accounts. They generally invest in the safest types of debt such as Treasury bonds.
The collapse of the fund run by New York-based Reserve Management Co. last fall was only the second such instance in the nearly four decades that money-market funds have been available.
The "breaking of the buck" by the Primary Fund — the first U.S. money fund, established in 1970 — stoked fears over the safety of the trillions held in the money funds.
The Securities and Exchange Commission later charged Reserve Management and its two top executives with civil fraud, saying they withheld key facts from investors. The firm and the executives have said they will defend themselves against the SEC's allegations.
Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.



32 Comments
WellsFucko
Rut-rho shaggy! Looks like it's time to buy a bigger mattress!
vike23
Could the banks be counting on a good percentage of these funds to find their way into stocks? After all, would it be surprising to learn that several trillion dollars from TARP bailouts have been used to gun the stock markets? If those two contentions were true then it would only make sense to try and force funds from the money markets into stocks so the banks will have ready and willing buyers for stocks they accumulated during the rally. One has to think like a criminal to have any chance at figuring the reality of it all.
Perhaps this end of the guarantees by the govt will have unintended consequences and usher in new precious metals buyers, the antithesis to the banks creating money from nothing. It would only be fair as a huge jump in gold and silver prices would absolutely punish the banks who have kept prices artificially low through the use of paper derivatives.
mikeinaz
Jim,
What do you suggest with Vanguard 401k mm funds?
TLaCour
Thanks for the heads-up, Jim. Like vike23 I've been wondering about the continued spike in the bond and equity markets and whether prudent money has been moved from MM funds into those vehicles.
kmensch
Apologies in advance for the rant but now that MM funds are free to fall, where does one protect their funds in a 401K fund? Employer has very few options, all $ and blue chip centric. Complaining to management to increase choices has led nowhere. Short of taking loans to remove the $ from funds I don't know what to do. Anyone else encounter this predicament?
Ritchie
Mutual Funds were never covered by FDIC insurance prior to this "program".
The "market" via yield has been telling us for some time that beyond the perceived "safe storage" of cash in money market or bank savings accounts there is no reason to keep your cash in these vehicles, yet the amount of money parked in these vehicles is huge. Reason... the next best alternative may be your mattress.
Therein lies the dilemma. Some of the smartest people in the country don't know what to do with their money so the demand for "safe storage" investments such as these is huge. Why reward investors with higher yields to do something they will do anyway.
Meanwhile... banks and mutual fund companies continue to reap big profits with our money from this carry trade.
Anonymous
Can someone explain this to me in simpler terms please. What happens when the gov't no longer guarantees the money markets?
Anonymous
So where is the safest FDIC INSURED place to put my money?
JimQ
Every bank and credit union is insured up to $250,000. I'd pick a small bank or credit union in your town that hasn't accepted TARP money.
CUMMF
I have money parked in a credit union money market fund. I understand that there are 2 types of MMFs, and mine is the type that is covered by the eqivalent of the FDIC. It's the NCUU or something like that. Can you help me with this one? I'm not in the mood to lose my life savings at the moment. :) Thanks.
oldbat
i don't think dh can take his out as long as he works at the company. as soon as he's layed off, we plan to transfer it to an ira. max loan he can take is 50% at 4.5%. how does one get the money out of the 401K while still working at the company?
ty
YellowHoard
This story flew beneath my radar.
The government clearly wants to force ma and pa retail investor into the markets.
It's like tossing a rattle snake into a family's tornado shelter as the twister approaches.
stock trader
Check your bank: http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/alabama/
Type your state in place of Alabama
Check your credit union: http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/credit-unions/alabama/
Type your state in place of Alabama
The above link allows you to check the *troubled asset ratio* of the bank or credit union you use.
As far as money market funds go (I was with Fidelity Investments) they have pretty much closed down their U.S. Treasury money market funds for some reason, maybe because the rates are so low. Fidelity *closed* Vanguard *closed* T. Rowe Price *closed*. I had to move my money to American Century Capital Preservation MMF (treasury's) out of Kansas City, MO
also you can go to U.S. Global Investors out of San Antonio, TX, they have a treasury MMF fund still open.