“Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” – George Washington
“I hope I shall possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain what I consider the most enviable of all titles, the character of an honest man.” – George Washington
“Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.” – George Washington
The Great American Republic was shaped by individual events which are now part of American legend. The Battle of Bunker Hill, The Winter at Valley Forge, Washington Crossing the Delaware, the Constitutional Convention, and George Washington stepping aside after his 2nd term as President, evoke pride and honor in the hearts of many Americans, if their public schools still teach about these historic events. The politically correct “history” books today are more likely to concentrate on the impact of Marilyn Monroe on the culture of America. The Founding Fathers, including James Madison, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, John Jay, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington, risked their lives to create a republic. These revolutionaries declared their independence from an overbearing oppressive regime. The British Empire had been taxing the colonies to pay for their foreign adventures. The Founding Fathers were willing to risk being hung rather than live under tyranny, when they made the following declaration:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
After risking their lives and fighting an eight year War for Independence against the most powerful military on earth, they came together and drafted the greatest governing document ever conceived. The U.S. Constitution and its Amendments struck the perfect balance, as it constrained the Federal government and allowed its citizens maximum freedom. It was designed to prevent the concentration of power by the Executive branch. Power was balanced between the three branches of government and jurisdiction was delegated to the States. Governance was placed in the hands of the people. This sublime document has served as our guide for over two centuries. Since the early 20th Century, America has gradually allowed this document to become tarnished and trivialized.
James Madison was the architect of this brilliant inspirational document in 1787. It is a remarkably concise document. The Constitution consisted of a preamble, seven original articles and the Bill of Rights. The beauty of this document is its clarity and brevity. An 81 year old Benjamin Franklin, whose health was rapidly failing but whose mind was as luminous as ever, on the last day of the Constitutional Convention urged passage of the Constitution with the following words of wisdom:
“ In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other. I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain, may be able to make a better Constitution.
Much of the strength & efficiency of any Government in procuring and securing happiness to the people depends, on opinion, on the general opinion of the goodness of the Government, as well as of the wisdom and integrity of its Governors. I hope therefore that for our own sakes as a part of the people, and for the sake of posterity, we shall act heartily and unanimously in recommending this Constitution (if approved by Congress & confirmed by the Conventions) wherever our influence may extend, and turn our future thoughts & endeavors to the means of having it well administered.
On the whole, Sir, I cannot help expressing a wish that every member of the Convention who may still have objections to it, would with me, on this occasion doubt a little of his own infallibility, and to make manifest our unanimity, put his name to this instrument.”
Mr. Franklin in his plea to those attending the Convention also issued a warning which we have not heeded. A Constitution is only as good as the people who administer it. If the people become corrupted, the government will become corrupted, and the Constitution will become a worthless piece of paper. The wisdom and integrity of the governors of the Constitution are the strength that makes the document so powerful. The American people have failed to take note of Benjamin Franklin’s warning. We have allowed our desire for material goods, acceptance of easy wrong solutions to complicated problems, putting our selfish short term desires ahead of the long-term needs of the country, and meddling in foreign lands, to corrupt our government and its leaders. Wisdom and integrity are rare traits in government officials today. They were plentiful during the American Revolution. These traits defined George Washington, the father of our country. These traits also define the U.S. Representative from Texas, Ron Paul.

A Noble Experiment - A Noble Leader
The ruling elite, backed by the powerful banking cartel, who control the political reins, the mainstream media, the military industrial complex, and the foreign policy of the United States, have trampled on the U.S. Constitution. They take every opportunity to denigrate its principles, call it an antiquated document meant for a simpler time, and scorn and ridicule those who risked their lives to write this noble governing document. The mainstream media attempts to protect its liberal agenda by disparaging the Boston Tea Party, Patriots, and the Founding Fathers. Millions of dazed and confused Americans know nothing about George Washington other than his face is on the dollars they use to buy Snuggies or fried Twinkies. They think his chief claim to fame is cutting down a cherry tree. The maligning of the Constitution and belittling of the men who created it, is part of the plan to retain and increase their power and control over the American people. If the broad swath of Americans decided to reinstitute the founding principles of the Constitution, the existing power structure would come crashing down in a heap of smoldering ashes. A Second American Revolution is brewing. The anger and rage of thinking Americans is palpable. The only question is whether this Second American Revolution will be peaceful or bloody. The Founding Fathers proved that an irate tireless minority can win.
George Washington is not a hollow, vacuous, meaningless symbol of a far simpler time. George Washington was a man of unquestioned integrity, tremendous leadership skills, true humbleness, and love of his country. He was truly the Father of our Nation. Henry Lee, in his eulogy of George Washington, captured the true spirit of the man:
“First in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen, he was second to none in humble and enduring scenes of private life. Pious, just, humane, temperate, and sincere; uniform, dignified, and commanding; his example was as edifying to all around him as were the effects of that example lasting...Correct throughout, vice shuddered in his presence and virtue always felt his fostering hand. The purity of his private character gave effulgence to his public virtues...Such was the man for whom our nation mourns.”
George Washington was born in 1732 in the British colony of Virginia to aristocratic parents. He could have lived a life of leisure on his plantation. Instead he chose a life of service to his country. He never involved himself in politics. He was a self taught surveyor and soldier. He did his duty on behalf of the British monarchy during the French and Indian War. He was living an aristocratic lifestyle in Virginia during the 1760’s when the British Parliament began passing its series of unfair tax acts (Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, Intolerable Acts). This imperious stomping on the rights and liberties of American colonists, led Washington to attend the 1st Continental Congress in 1774. After the opening shot was fired at Lexington & Concord, Washington arrived at the 2nd Continental Congress in military uniform. He was ready to risk his life and serve his country. The Continental Congress appointed him commander in chief of the Continental Army. He held this position for the next eight years of trial and tribulation.
A lesser man would have balked at such an overwhelming life threatening task. Instead, he rode to Boston and assumed command of an undisciplined army of citizen farmers. He led this army through dark days and against insurmountable odds, outmaneuvering, outthinking, and ultimately defeating the vaunted British Regulars and the most powerful Navy on the face of the earth. Despite the lack of troops, lack of training, lack of ammunition, lack of food, lack of supplies and lack of support from the states, George Washington never lost his faith in his troops, his righteous cause of liberty or himself. The two events that embody all of the noble characteristics of Washington and the fledgling Republic were Washington crossing the Delaware to attack Trenton on Christmas night in 1776 and the winter at Valley Forge.
After losing a number of skirmishes with the British in New York and retreating into New Jersey, the morale of Washington’s army was at a low point. Soldiers were deserting and re-enlistments were declining. The weather was dreadful and even Washington feared the end of the revolution was at hand. The future of the fledgling country hung in the balance. On the night of December 25, 1776 General Washington and 2,400 troops set out on their rendezvous with destiny. General Washington’s password for the surprise attack on Trenton was Victory or Death. No words could have been truer. If Washington’s surprise attack failed, the war was lost. The boldness, audacity and brilliance of Washington’s plan was representative of the spirit and daring of the Patriots in there desperate struggle for independence. Crossing the ice clogged Delaware River in small wooden row boats in the middle of the night during an ice storm while two supporting groups failed to get across the river was a feat in itself. He then led his troops on a 9 mile march to Trenton. They attacked the Hessians and captured 1,000 out of the 1,500 man garrison. This victory over Regulars in the British Army rejuvenated the revolution. Washington followed this victory with another at Princeton. The Revolution had been in doubt only a week earlier, and the army was on the verge of collapse. With this bold victory, soldiers agreed to stay and new recruits came and joined the ranks.
One year later after losing battles at Brandywine and Germantown, Washington abandoned Philadelphia and retreated to Valley Forge in December 1777 with his weary, ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-equipped and ill-trained army of 12,000 citizen soldiers. Undernourished and lacking boots and uniforms, living in cramped, damp quarters, the army was devastated by illness and disease. Typhoid, jaundice, dysentery, and pneumonia were among the assassins that felled 2,000 men that winter. Washington voiced his despair in letter that winter:
Adequate clothing was scarce. Long marches had destroyed boots. Blankets were in short supply. Tattered uniforms were rarely replaced. At one point these deficiencies led 4,000 men to be listed as unfit for duty. A lesser man and citizen soldiers who cared more for their own farmsteads than their country, would have abandoned this seemingly forlorn cause. Instead, Washington and his dedicated patriot soldiers used the next six months to become a true army. Baron von Steuben, a onetime member of the staff of Frederick the Great in the Prussian Army, volunteered to help General Washington turn his men into an army. And this he did. From dawn to dusk his familiar voice was heard in camp above the sounds of marching men and shouted commands. Soon companies, regiments then brigades moved smartly from line to column, column to line and loaded muskets with precision. In June 1778 Washington’s Army departed Valley Forge as a cohesive unit ready for five more years of war. These men had forged a fresh spirit towards the birth of a new Republic. They had conquered the weather, doubt, and lack of training through sheer force of will, hard work, dedication and willingness to sacrifice, all for the good of a nation.
After the final victory in 1783, Washington could have become the King of America. Instead he resigned his commission as commander-in-chief and retired to Mount Vernon, reflecting his view that the new government should be a citizen government. He was persuaded to come out of retirement and preside over the Constitutional Convention as its president. His congenial personality and stature as a hero kept the delegates focused on the task. The delegates created the Presidency with him in mind and would allow him to define the office. His support of the Constitution convinced the Virginia legislature and many others to support ratification. Washington was unanimously elected President in 1789 and 1792 by the Electoral College, despite not seeking the position. President Washington proved a highly proficient administrator. A first rate delegator and evaluator of aptitude and moral fiber, he held regular cabinet meetings to deliberate issues before making a final decision. In handling everyday tasks, he was "systematic, orderly, energetic, solicitous of the opinion of others but decisive, intent upon general goals and the consistency of particular actions with them", according to historian Leonard White. He planned to retire after his 1st term but the growing divisions between the newly formed Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties, along with the current state of foreign affairs, would tear the country apart in the absence of his leadership and convinced him to serve a 2nd term. He refused to serve a 3rd term, retiring again to Mount Vernon, dying two years later at the age of 67.
This wise, larger than life man was more than a myth. He was genuine human being whose tremendous attributes founded our great Republic. He deserves the utmost praise and respect for his continuous 45 years of dedicated service in creating a nation of and for the people. His writings, speeches and Farewell Address clearly reflect his belief in the Constitution and the American people.
The Constitution is the guide which I never will abandon. - George Washington
The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. – George Washington
Foreign Policy
The Constitution of the United States of America clearly delineated the powers between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches. Regarding foreign intervention, Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution is clear regarding Congress’ responsibility:
- To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
- To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
- To provide and maintain a Navy;
- To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
- To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasion;
- To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
George Washington was a military hero who, as President, preached non-interventionism, free trade, and the danger of a too powerful military. He did so because he rightly knew that foreign entanglements would be detrimental to the people. His Farewell Address to the American people couldn’t have been clearer.
“Observe good faith and justice towards all Nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular Nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated.
Sympathy for the favorite Nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification.
As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent Patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the Public Councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and powerful nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.
The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing.”
The Constitution is crystal clear. President Washington was crystal clear. Our country has not heeded the requirements of the Constitution or the wisdom of our greatest President. The United States has troops stationed in 130 countries throughout the world. The United States’ direct military spending in excess of $700 billion per year constitutes 48% of all the military spending in the world. Essentially, the United States spends as much as the rest of the world combined. The U.S. spends another $300 billion per year on costs related to prior wars and the interest on the debt incurred to conduct those wars.
The U.S. military has 1.5 million active personnel and another 1.5 million reserve personnel. The U.S. Navy has 280 ships and 3,700 aircraft. The U.S. Air Force has 5,573 aircraft, 446 ICBMs, and 32 satellites. The U.S. Army has 7,851 M1 Abrams tanks, 6,724 Bradley fighting vehicles, 15,000 armored personnel carriers, 80,000 HUMVEEs, 1,300 attack helicopters, 3,000 other helicopters, and a few other miscellaneous odds and ends. The U.S. Marine Corp has thousands of vehicles and aircraft to fulfill their mission. Does this force seem adequate to protect the United States from attack by Iran, Afghanistan or North Korea? The U.S. military is clearly a BIG hammer. When you are a BIG hammer, everything looks like a nail. Former supreme commander of the military and President of the U.S. George Washington, had this to say about overgrown military establishments:
“Overgrown military establishments are under any form of government inauspicious to liberty, and are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty.”
Another former general, Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his own Presidential Farewell Address warned of the implications of the military industrial complex:
“This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”
The military industrial complex is stronger, more insidious, more powerful, and more dangerous than any time in our 220 year history. The defense industry lobbyists bribe Congress with contributions to their political campaigns and reward them with lucrative jobs when they leave government “service”, in return for billions in weapons contracts. Our best and brightest technical minds are focused on producing technology to kill people more efficiently. In the meantime, our bridges collapse into rivers, our water pipes burst, and our energy infrastructure rusts away. Only Congressman Ron Paul, who has not been bought by the defense industry, has been brave enough to speak the truth:
“War is never economically beneficial except for those in position to profit from war expenditures.”
Only the defense industry and their bought politicians profit from the $1 trillion that the U.S. borrows from the Chinese to fund our foreign intervention policies. Is it possible that those within the defense industry promote instability and war throughout the world? That couldn’t be possible, because they have noble intentions, just like the citizen soldiers at Valley Forge. The fact is that the United States is the most powerful country in the history of the world. If Defense spending was cut by $500 billion, we would still be the most powerful country in the history of the world. Ron Paul put it quite succinctly in 2007:
"There's nobody in this world that could possibly attack us today... I mean, we could defend this country with a few good submarines. If anybody dared touch us we could wipe any country off of the face of the earth within hours. And here we are, so intimidated and so insecure and we're acting like such bullies that we have to attack third-world nations that have no military and have no weapon."
Of course, the politicians occupying the halls of Congress for the last 50 years have completely ignored their Constitutional obligation to declare war before sending American troops into harm’s way. George Washington knew the danger of committing American troops without proper authorization:
“The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.”
The last time that the U.S. Congress carried out its Constitutional obligation and declared war was World War II. Below are 50 combat operations since World War II where Americans have been sent into battle with no declaration of war. This is a compete flaunting of the U.S. Constitution.
|
KOREA |
1951-53 (-?) |
Troops, naval, bombing , nuclear threats |
U.S./So. Korea fights China/No. Korea to stalemate; A-bomb threat in 1950, and against China in 1953. Still have bases. |
|
IRAN |
1953 |
Command Operation |
CIA overthrows democracy, installs Shah. |
|
VIETNAM |
l960-75 |
Troops, naval, bombing, nuclear threats |
Fought South Vietnam revolt & North Vietnam; one million killed in longest U.S. war; atomic bomb threats in l968 and l969. |
|
CUBA |
l961 |
Command operation |
CIA-directed exile invasion fails. |
|
LAOS |
1962 |
Command operation |
Military buildup during guerrilla war. |
|
CUBA |
l962 |
Nuclear threat, naval |
Blockade during missile crisis; near-war with Soviet Union. |
|
IRAQ |
1963 |
Command operation |
CIA organizes coup that killed president, brings Ba'ath Party to power, and Saddam Hussein back from exile to be head of the secret service. |
|
PANAMA |
l964 |
Troops |
Panamanians shot for urging canal's return. |
|
INDONESIA |
l965 |
Command operation |
Million killed in CIA-assisted army coup. |
|
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC |
1965-66 |
Troops, bombing |
Marines land during election campaign. |
|
GUATEMALA |
l966-67 |
Command operation |
Green Berets intervene against rebels. |
|
CAMBODIA |
l969-75 |
Bombing, troops, naval |
Up to 2 million killed in decade of bombing, starvation, and political chaos. |
|
OMAN |
l970 |
Command operation |
U.S. directs Iranian marine invasion. |
|
LAOS |
l971-73 |
Command operation, bombing |
U.S. directs South Vietnamese invasion; "carpet-bombs" countryside. |
|
CHILE |
1973 |
Command operation |
CIA-backed coup ousts elected marxist president. |
|
ANGOLA |
l976-92 |
Command operation |
CIA assists South African-backed rebels. |
|
LIBYA |
l981 |
Naval jets |
Two Libyan jets shot down in maneuvers. |
|
EL SALVADOR |
l981-92 |
Command operation, troops |
Advisors, overflights aid anti-rebel war, soldiers briefly involved in hostage clash. |
|
NICARAGUA |
l981-90 |
Command operation, naval |
CIA directs exile (Contra) invasions, plants harbor mines against revolution. |
|
LEBANON |
l982-84 |
Naval, bombing, troops |
Marines expel PLO and back Phalangists, Navy bombs and shells Muslim positions. |
|
GRENADA |
l983-84 |
Troops, bombing |
Invasion four years after revolution. |
|
HONDURAS |
l983-89 |
Troops |
Maneuvers help build bases near borders. |
|
IRAN |
l984 |
Jets |
Two Iranian jets shot down over Persian Gulf. |
|
LIBYA |
l986 |
Bombing, naval |
Air strikes to topple nationalist gov't. |
|
IRAN |
l987-88 |
Naval, bombing |
US intervenes on side of Iraq in war. |
|
LIBYA |
1989 |
Naval jets |
Two Libyan jets shot down. |
|
PHILIPPINES |
1989 |
Jets |
Air cover provided for government against coup. |
|
PANAMA |
1989 (-?) |
Troops, bombing |
Nationalist government ousted by 27,000 soldiers, leaders arrested, 2000+ killed. |
|
SAUDI ARABIA |
1990-91 |
Troops, jets |
Iraq countered after invading Kuwait. 540,000 troops also stationed in Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Israel. |
|
IRAQ |
1990-? |
Bombing, troops, naval |
Blockade of Iraqi and Jordanian ports, air strikes; 200,000+ killed in invasion of Iraq and Kuwait; no-fly zone over Kurdish north, Shiite south, large-scale destruction of Iraqi military. |
|
KUWAIT |
1991 |
Naval, bombing, troops |
Kuwait royal family returned to throne. |
|
SOMALIA |
1992-94 |
Troops, naval, bombing |
U.S.-led United Nations occupation during civil war; raids against one Mogadishu faction. |
|
YUGOSLAVIA |
1992-94 |
Naval |
NATO blockade of Serbia and Montenegro. |
|
BOSNIA |
1993-? |
Jets, bombing |
No-fly zone patrolled in civil war; downed jets, bombed Serbs. |
|
HAITI |
1994 |
Troops, naval |
Blockade against military government; troops restore President Aristide to office three years after coup. |
|
SUDAN |
1998 |
Missiles |
Attack on pharmaceutical plant alleged to be "terrorist" nerve gas plant. |
|
AFGHANISTAN |
1998 |
Missiles |
Attack on former CIA training camps used by Islamic fundamentalist groups alleged to have attacked embassies. |
|
IRAQ |
1998-? |
Bombing, Missiles |
Four days of intensive air strikes after weapons inspectors allege Iraqi obstructions. |
|
YUGOSLAVIA |
1999 |
Bombing, Missiles |
Heavy NATO air strikes after Serbia declines to withdraw from Kosovo. NATO occupation of Kosovo. |
|
MACEDONIA |
2001 |
Troops |
NATO forces deployed to move and disarm Albanian rebels. |
|
AFGHANISTAN |
2001-? |
Troops, bombing, missiles |
Massive U.S. mobilization to overthrow Taliban, hunt Al Qaeda fighters, install Karzai regime, and battle Taliban insurgency. More than 60,000 U.S. troops and numerous private security contractors carry our occupation. |
|
PHILIPPINES |
2002-? |
Troops, naval |
Training mission for Philippine military fighting Abu Sayyaf rebels evolves into combat missions in Sulu Archipelago, west of Mindanao. |
|
COLOMBIA |
2003-? |
Troops |
US special forces sent to rebel zone to back up Colombian military protecting oil pipeline. |
|
IRAQ |
2003-? |
Troops, naval, bombing, missiles |
Saddam regime toppled in Baghdad. More than 250,000 U.S. personnel participate in invasion. US and UK forces occupy country and battle Sunni and Shi'ite insurgencies. More than 160,000 troops and numerous private contractors carry out occupation and build large permanent bases. |
|
HAITI |
2004-05 |
Troops, naval |
Marines land after right-wing rebels oust elected President Aristide, who was advised to leave by Washington. |
|
PAKISTAN |
2005-? |
Missiles, bombing, covert operation |
CIA missile and air strikes and Special Forces raids on alleged Al Qaeda and Taliban refuge villages kill multiple civilians. |
|
SOMALIA |
2006-? |
Missiles, naval, covert operation |
Special Forces advise Ethiopian invasion that topples Islamist government; AC-130 strikes and Cruise missile attacks against Islamist rebels; naval blockade against "pirates" and insurgents. |
|
SYRIA |
2008 |
Troops |
Special Forces in helicopter raid 5 miles from Iraq kill 8 Syrian civilians |
“The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.” – Ron Paul
As I watched the disgraceful Republican Presidential primaries during 2008, I wondered what had happened to the conservative Republican Party. It had been hijacked by the neoconservatives. These people are as far from conservative as you can get. Their agenda is to aggressively use American economic and military power to bring liberalism and democracy to foreign countries, whether they like it or not. Ron Paul was the only candidate to stand for the true principles of the Republican Party. He pointed out that the Republican Party had been non-interventionist throughout the 20th Century and as recently as the year 2000, it was still the hallmark of the party:
“Throughout the 20th century, the Republican Party benefited from a non-interventionist foreign policy. Think of how Eisenhower came in to stop the Korean War. Think of how Nixon was elected to stop the mess in Vietnam. How did we win the election in the year 2000? We talked about a humble foreign policy: No nation-building; don't police the world. That's conservative, it's Republican, it's pro-American - it follows the founding fathers. And, besides, it follows the Constitution.”
As I watched the kindergarten military experts Guliani, Romney, and Huckabee scornfully lecture Ron Paul on American foreign policy, I was taken aback by their utter hypocrisy and lack of Constitutional knowledge. Three men who never spent one second in the U.S. military, even though two were in their twenties during the Vietnam War, lecturing a man who served in the U.S. Air Force from 1962 through 1968 as a flight surgeon. These men join the other neo-cons that avoided service in Vietnam, George Bush and Dick Cheney (applied for 5 draft deferments) in the neo-con hall of shame. The military “hero”, John McCain, was disdainful towards Mr. Paul’s contention that the invasion of Iraq was unconstitutional. McCain’s impeccable military record of graduating 894th out of 899 at the Naval Academy, crashing 3 planes, being shot down over Hanoi, and cracking under torture by the North Vietnamese, certainly qualified him as an expert in casting aside the Constitution forged by George Washington and true patriots. Ron Paul was the only true conservative Republican, in the spirit of Ronald Reagan, on that stage.
“Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.” – Ron Paul
“History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.” – Ronald Reagan
Civil Liberties
George Washington warned against the usurpation of civil liberties by those seeking power in his Farewell Address:
“However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines, which have lifted them to unjust dominion.
It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution, in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the Guardian of the Public Weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them.”
The Constitution addressed the civil liberties of citizens in the Bill of Rights:
First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Second Amendment - A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Americans have chosen to trade their civil liberties for the safety and security of a military welfare state. We have allowed the Federal government to overtake a vast slice of our lives. Between financial bailouts and the economic stimulus program, Federal government spending accounts for 26% of the nation’s economy. The government is financing 9 out of 10 new mortgages in the United States. If you buy a car from General Motors, you are buying from a company that is 60% owned by the government. Politicians are now trying to swell their power over all citizens by taking over the healthcare system after seizing control of the banking system in the last year. The liberal media ridicules and scorns the Americans who have been exercising their First Amendment right to peaceably assemble and protest this overreach of government. Liberal biased commentators condemn the citizens speaking out at town hall meetings. Left wing politicians spew lies about potential violence and racism against Obama coming from these angry American citizens. Right wing neo-con commentators like Sean Hannity try to latch onto the protests, even though most of the protestors would spit in his face if they could. The agendas of the extreme left and extreme right both infringe upon the civil liberties of American citizens. If our freedom of speech and freedom of expression in print and on the internet are taken away, a totalitarian state is not far behind.
“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” – George Washington
“All initiation of force is a violation of someone else's rights, whether initiated by an individual or the state, for the benefit of an individual or group of individuals, even if it's supposed to be for the benefit of another individual or group of individuals.” – Ron Paul
Those who control the reins of power do not trust the citizens. They want to easily manipulate the sedated masses with their message using their controlled corporate mass media. Having taken over the public school system decades ago, government has worked its magic and graduates millions of functionally illiterate drones into society every year. More than 50% of these morons don’t know that George Washington was the 1st President of the United States and is the guy on the quarters jingling in their pocket. The ignorance of a huge portion of the American population has resulted in a decline of freedom and liberty over time.
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." – Thomas Jefferson
When the government starts to infringe upon the citizen’s Second Amendment rights, the time will be nearing for a Second American Revolution. There are now shortages of guns and ammunition in the U.S. Two thirds of the public believe that Obama will restrict gun ownership. He has stated that intention. The Second Amendment is very clear, but Obama will interpret it any way he chooses because he is in power. The Nazis imposed strict gun control measures shortly after Hitler came to power. The lambs complied. We all know what happened next. In the first chapter of his book, Freedom Under Siege, Ron Paul argued that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to place a check on government tyranny, not to merely grant hunting rights or allow self defense. When forced to choose between the wisdom of George Washington and Barack Hussein Obama, I think it is an easy choice. Who uses the weasel words?
“Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth.” – George Washington
“As a general principle, I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can’t constrain the exercise of that right, in the same way that we have a right to private property but local governments can establish zoning ordinances that determine how you can use it.” – Barack Obama
The neo-cons who dominated the administration of George W. Bush seized the 9/11 terrorist attack as a once in a lifetime opportunity to change the world. In doing so, they have used fear, visions of mushroom clouds, and promises of protection and safety to convince the American people to give up their few remaining civil liberties. The Patriot Act was rammed down our throats in the months following 9/11. Anyone who would vote against such a bill was branded un-patriotic. It passed the Senate by a vote of 98 to 1. It passed the House by 357 to 66. Only 3 Republicans voted against The Patriot Act. Three Republicans had the courage to stand up for the Constitution. Ron Paul, from Texas, was one of them. His belief cannot be any clearer:
"Everything we have done in response to the 9-11 attacks, from the Patriot Act to the war in Iraq, has reduced freedom in America."
The role of government is to protect American citizens’ privacy, not violate it. Since 9/11 all American citizens are considered suspect until proven otherwise by some bureaucratic thug in the Department of Homeland Security. The Eye (think Mordor) of the U.S. government is focused inwards towards its own citizens under the guise of protecting us from unknown bogeymen terrorists. We are no safer, with less freedom, and buried under more debt. Mr. Paul’s reasoning and adherence to the Constitution of the United States is so sane that it seems insane to the criminals running our asylum (aka government) today. We live in a bizzaro world where doing the opposite of what we should be doing is considered the right thing to do. Liberty is not some antiquated concept in the ether of history. Liberty is freedom from arbitrary or despotic control, allowing for the enjoyment of social, economic, and political rights and privileges. President Washington and Representative Paul seem to be reading from the same Constitution.
“Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness. It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.” – George Washington
Economics
Amazingly, after reading George Washington’s (home schooled and suffering from really bad teeth) advice regarding the use of public debt, I think he would have made a better Federal Reserve Chairman than Helicopter Ben Bernanke, with his BA from Harvard and PhD from MIT, and perfect teeth. This military man, in his Farwell Address to the American people, advised the country to cultivate peace with all countries, therefore not incurring debt to fight wars. Surpluses should be built up in times of peace in order to pay the costs of unavoidable wars (not pre-emptive wars of aggression). Our representatives are responsible for the proper fiscal management of the country, but the public must be vigilant in policing the representatives. Washington saw taxes as an unpleasant but necessary evil. The way to keep taxes low was to keep spending under control. With our $11.9 TRILLION National Debt and 67,000 page IRS tax code, I think we have gone slightly off track.
“As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is, to use it as sparingly as possible; avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of peace to discharge the debts, which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burthen, which we ourselves ought to bear. The execution of these maxims belongs to your representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should cooperate.
To facilitate to them the performance of their duty, it is essential that you should practically bear in mind, that towards the payment of debts there must be Revenue; that to have Revenue there must be taxes; that no taxes can be devised, which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant; that the intrinsic embarrassment, inseparable from the selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties), ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue, which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.”
- The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
- To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
- To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
Congress has done a phenomenal job in taxing, spending and borrowing. Nobody does it better. They should get a Congressional gold medal for taxing, spending and borrowing. Up until 1913, the government was limited in their ability to spend because there was no personal income tax and the currency of the United States was backed by hard assets. Woodrow Wilson and Congressmen, under the control of the banking cartel, created the Federal Reserve and the personal income tax in 1913. The unleashing of politicians from any constraints on their spending has led to a predictable result. The US dollar has lost 97% of its value versus gold since 1913. The U.S. National Debt was $2.9 billion in 1913. Today, it is $11.9 TRILLION, a mere 400,000% increase in 96 years. That is the good news. President Obama plans to add at least another $9 TRILLION to our debt in the next 10 years. That is the actual plan. Can you picture George Washington spinning in his grave?
“Deficits mean future tax increases, pure and simple. Deficit spending should be viewed as a tax on future generations, and politicians who create deficits should be exposed as tax hikers.” – Ron Paul
There goes that crazy Ron Paul again stirring up trouble. Doesn’t this guy realize that if we adhered to sound money policies, had a hard asset backed currency, and spent only as much as we brought in, the existing political structure and its corporate, banker, and military backers would collapse? This would cause turmoil and heartache for the ruling power elite. They might have to sell one of their 6 estates. Ron Paul would abolish the Federal Reserve and the IRS. The Federal Reserve is a secret organization controlled by bankers to enrich bankers and allow politicians to get re-elected by bribing their constituents with goodies. Our system is no more capitalist than that of the Soviet Union.
“A system of capitalism presumes sound money, not fiat money manipulated by a central bank. Capitalism cherishes voluntary contracts and interest rates that are determined by savings, not credit creation by a central bank.” – Ron Paul
True capitalism is the antithesis of what the power elite want. This kind of talk puts bankers and politicians into convulsions as their levers of power would be stripped away. Paul has stated: "I agree on getting rid of the IRS, but I want to replace it with nothing, not another tax.” The financially retarded pundits who question Paul’s stance can’t comprehend dismantling of the vast all encompassing Federal Government bureaucracy. They argue that the country would be plunged into Depression. What do they call what we are in today? Rather than conclude that the gig is up and that running up huge deficits in order to police the world and provide welfare benefits to the 50% of the population that does not pay income taxes, Obama and Bernanke have decided to double down. Their solution is to double the National Debt, greatly expand the welfare state, and continue to police the world. Does anyone really think it is going to work? Bankruptcy is a certainty.
“My observation is that whenever one person is found adequate to the discharge of a duty... it is worse executed by two persons, and scarcely done at all if three or more are employed therein.” – George Washington

Call out the instigator
Because there’s something in the air
We’ve got to get together sooner or later
Because the revolutions here
And you know it’s right
And you know that its right
We have got to get it together
We have got to get it together now
Something in the Air – Tom Petty
There is the smell of revolution in the air. The mainstream media doesn’t get it. The 15 term Congressmen don’t get it. The doddering old fool Robert Byrd doesn’t get it. We’ve entered a twenty year crisis period that cycles through history every 80 years or so. The short-sighted non-thinking pundits actually think we are coming out of the crisis, when it has barely begun. The crisis period is always a time of pain, suffering and usually armed conflict. The details are unknown, but the broad outline is known. Existing institutions will be torn down. Many will die. Heroes will be required. The generations are moving into new life phases and their attitudes and beliefs will heavily influence the path of this crisis. Will we experience World War III? Will civil unrest and insurrection breakout in the U.S.? Will U.S. Troops be commanded to fire on U.S. citizens? Might they turn their guns on those giving the commands? This sounds extremely far-fetched. Yes it does. It sounds as far-fetched as someone telling Abraham Lincoln on April 12, 1861, as Fort Sumpter was being shelled, that 620,000 Americans would die in the next four years of Civil War. It sounds as farfetched as telling Herbert Hoover on October 24, 1929 that the stock market would crash 89% in the next 3 years, a Depression with unemployment reaching 25% would last 12 years, and a World War would ensue causing the deaths of 73 million people and ending with the detonation of two atomic bombs.
I’ve slowly come to the conclusion that the country cannot be put back on track using the ballot box. The entrenched special interests control all the levers of power. The Republican and Democratic parties are essentially interchangeable. They are controlled by the extreme right and left wings of their parties. The neo-cons on the right have no interest in balancing budgets or restraining government. They want to use the power of our immense military to remake the world in the image of the United States. They utilize the term “strategic interest” to rationalize any foreign military venture that suits them. A bunch of flea bitten rag heads in the most godforsaken country on earth are a threat in these people’s eyes. The left wing liberal welfare statists have never come across a program to redistribute wealth from the hard working middle class to the non-working shiftless, lazy uneducated masses, that they didn’t favor. The printing of money by the Federal Reserve, massive deficit spending and higher taxes support their agendas.
Ron Paul will never get elected President of the United States. His message is not sellable to the American public. It would require sacrifice, self discipline, living within your means, exhibiting humbleness in foreign policy, and following the Constitution of the United States. He will not be elected, but he can become the intellectual founding father of the new country that comes out on the other side of this crisis. His noble stand for the principles of the U.S. Constitution will lead us through the Second American Revolution. The Ron Paul inspired Campaign for Liberty is using grassroots efforts to get like minded citizens elected to local offices. This is a worthwhile effort, but I fear we don’t have enough time to acquire enough political power before the existing debt induced, corrupt system collapses under the weight of its lies and mismanagement. It will surprise many, just as the collapse of the Soviet Union came as a complete bombshell.
When the system collapses, no one knows what will happen. Do the frightened masses turn to a strong dictator, choosing safety and slavery over liberty and freedom? It is entirely possible. This is where those who believe in the Constitution can make our stand. We already have the document and the principles of government. We just need to adhere to and reinstitute them. Now is the time to join up with groups of like minded citizens. Meet regularly and discuss the real issues. Develop relationships with these people. When the shit hits the fan, they will be there to support you. Having like minded groups communicating in person and through the internet today could set the groundwork for the new country. Ideas are what drive revolutions. The collapse of the U.S. dollar is likely to be the trigger for the systematic collapse. It makes tremendous sense to be trading your future worthless pieces of paper for real money today. As the government sees the imminent collapse, they will become more desperate. Acquiring guns legally today is a good insurance policy for what might happen in the future.
The mainstream media will continue to ridicule those who fight for the Constitution. Ron Paul is just a man. He is no savior. It’s his ideas that matter. George Washington was just a man. He was a man who gave everything for his country. Are you ready to get out of your SUV and fight for the Constitution? The time is near at hand.
The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves. – George Washington
Please join me at www.TheBurningPlatform.com to fight for our Constitution.
That George Washington was quite a card. He truly understood how efficient our government would become in the next two centuries. When he occupied the position of President, the entire government consisted of a couple thousand workers. Today, the Federal government spends in excess of $3 TRILLION per year and employs in excess of 4 million drones. There are 140 million Americans employed today and 22 million of them work in government jobs. Nearly one in six working Americans is on the government payroll. Millions more are dependent upon the government to provide them welfare benefits, food stamps, insurance benefits, and pension benefits. Over 50% of Americans don’t pay income taxes. What is the likelihood that these leeches will be voting for candidates that propose sound money, low taxes, dramatically reduced domestic spending, and termination of our global empire?
“When the federal government spends more each year than it collects in tax revenues, it has three choices: It can raise taxes, print money, or borrow money. While these actions may benefit politicians, all three options are bad for average Americans.” – Ron Paul
“Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy.” – Ron Paul
"that unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place ... this Army must inevitably ... Starve, dissolve, or disperse, in order to obtain subsistence in the best manner they can."







110 Comments
ptownman
Ron Paul is doing what he is doing, for ALL OF US, as did John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. Most people do what they are doing for themselves. These three are doing and did do it, for ALL OF US.
Anonymous
“Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” – George Washington
George was correct in saying what he said. I only wonder if he was conscious of the fact that this is/was an issue of structure. Hard to say because it's a little like wondering if fish know there is life beyond the paradigm of being submerged in the water. George's comments are a product of the hierarchical paradigm, created with supply driven applications before the advent of the information age.
We're here to create a "rounder" world , free from focal points of power consolidation ...... but by way of the market !
JennJohnson
Excellent article! And the MSM says we're the Populists! I think this is probably the antithesis of the Populist movement.
taxpayer
Hi,
One of the interesting things about the Tea Parties is that so many people make assumptions about what those citizens are angry about. And so the Tea Party participants are really just a projection of the wishes of those who observe them. If I were at a Tea party/tax revolt, this is where my anger would be:
I'm angry that my tax dollars are used to fund illegal and immoral wars [currently Iraq and Afghanistan].
I am angry that my tax dollars fund the military industrial complex that makes continued wars necessary in order to keep big corporations profitable.
I'm angry that my tax dollars are being used to pay outrageously immoral salaries to entitled CEOs of private companies who deserve NONE of my money. I don't care whether or not they were in on the original scams.
I'm angry at the bank bailouts - every one of those insolvent private or quasi-private companies should have been in orderly bankruptcies. They are ten thousand times worse than any "welfare queen" in terms of the depth and extent of their entitlement mentalities.
I am angry that corporate America and the US government are now one and the same entity - corporatism and fascism are the order of the day. Socialism, my ass!
What I support:
A reasonable universal health care for all
We reconfigure Social Security so that it takes care of indigent and poor elderly ONLY which was its original intent
We end EVERY subsidy regardless of whether it is supported by liberals or conservatives
We ban lobbying completely [I have a brilliant substitute plan!]
We have publicly funded elections and have a six week campaign season
We dismantle the Federal Reserve
We bring back Eliot Spitzer to lead the investigations into criminal activity on Wall St/DC. He hung out with prostitutes and pimps; he's EXACTLY the right guy for the job.
We cut military spending by half
And finally, if the Congress wants to vote to go to war, then every single member who supports going to war either has to enlist, or have one of their children or grandchildren enlist. If they won't do that, they can't vote yes to go to war. NO exceptions.
Bye, y'all.
JasonRines
We added the ability to send the articles here from TBP far and wide. Note this ability at the end of every article. I'll make a prediction because I can measure everything. I'll wager that 4% of you will actually forward the articles. By 2012, that number will reach 8%. Historic trend tells us that economic pain is the catalyst of change (Not the lip service President Obama was stumping at during election time).
It is estimated that less then 10% of the entire population assisted the Revolutionaries. Human nature does not change, the percentages will shake out the same this time as well. I can already tell the 4% number by donations but I'll measure forwards of these articles as well as a general barometer of public sentiment and actions taken. Jim is right, the difference between the two political parties in Washington is like the difference between Coke and Pepsi. The "neo" agenda of left or right is a Cerebeus, two ugly heads and one mutated body.
Four years from the start of depressionary numbers (Q4 2008) result in voter revolution. This is the 4th era of government/banking collusion (1810's, 1870's, 1910's and current). Voting out the bum in your own back yard is voter revolution. Reelection ratios of 95% exist when times are good. They drop to 65%-70% four years after the start of depressions.
We'll try it the peaceful way and arm Patriots of all political spectrums with blogging sites and attempt to reach consenus and make political change in 2012. If that fails, government will fire the first shots in attempting to collect the increased taxes amoungst a population that can no longer afford to live. Just like the first American Revolution. Decide to be a part of history, rather then biting your nails off hoping someone else will become the next George Washington. Many have asked me or Jim how to help. Forwarding the articles is a good start which we have just made a lot easier.
compoundfracture
Wow, JQ. That is a real shot across the bow. This is an excellent bit of writing you have pulled together here. I found myself coming to attention and getting ready to snap off a salute while reading.
In the end, though, I can't agree with the part about not being able to change our predicament through the vote. My opinion is that it is never too late as long as we have the vote. I understand where you're coming from, and I really don't wish to argue so much as state my opinion. I still think we can do this, and this is the best chance I've seen to get it done in my almost 50 years of breathing. I'm not ready to say Ron can't get elected. We must continue to prepare the ground, and the ground is as fertile as I can ever remember seeing it.
I too get sick of defending the constitution. It is a smart, intelligent gathering of the best of governing principles ever devised by humans. It is not perfect - couldn't be - but it is as about as close as humans can get.
An outstanding and inspiring article, Jim. This is now one of my favorites from you.
frances snoot
bill_flinn
Dear Jim,
I would like to draw your readers' attention to an audio interview with Eric King at King World News (http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast_Gold+/Entries/2009/9/25_GATA.html) in which he talks with Bill Murphy and Chris Powell of GATA over this very topic of Federal Reserve secret activity in the markets and the "Audit the Fed" bill now before Congress.
This is a powerful interview; I for one was very impressed, and I have taken the liberty of summarizing the points made in the interview and posting them on my own site at http://goldsurvivalguide.co.nz/
Best,
Bill Flinn
frances snoot
frances snoot
Anonymous
No one has a moral right to health care, or any other welfare benefit from the government, paid for by others. People in real need should rely on private charity.
Better try to revive the Articles of Confederation!
Anonymous
Another otherwise useful column tainted and made unforwardable to intelligent associates by its inclusion of easily verifyable false information or hyperbole.
Several of the 50 military actions listed were not invasions, wars, or even military action. Some were clear defensive acts (planes shot down in Libyan gulf) which are completely constitutional, like the mission they were on or not, others are purely intelligence actions, some are ally-training missions, others are CIA led "assistance", which while ambiguous, is certainly not as you clearly claim "Americans sent into battle".
Let go of your ego and let a historian edit your column if you aren't willing to put in the work.
Indian
Wonderful Article, as usual, Mr.Quinn!!
I am not an American. I am an Indian. The more I come to know about the American Constituition the more I am amazed at the tremendrous foresight & immense wisdom of your founding fathers. No wonder that your country is (should I say was?) the greatest nation that this world has ever seen. It definitely evokes envy when I compare it to our Indian constituition which is a sorry re-hashed piece of work from the already sorry British Constituition.
It really is a work of Art! The increasing violation of this work of Art is surely very unfortunate for the world at large.
Eric
It's obvious that Anonymous is really in tune with the Constitution.
" Some were clear defensive acts (planes shot down in Libyan gulf) which are completely constitutional, like the mission they were on or not, others are purely intelligence actions, some are ally-training missions, others are CIA led "assistance", which while ambiguous, is certainly not as you clearly claim "Americans sent into battle".
Gee! I feel better knowing all this.
Anonymous
JQ, I get it. However, your articles seem to attract the ignorant "Hate the Government" zealots. Why is that? The Constitution is all about governing the country. I suppose everyone wants to pump water from a well, drive on dirt roads, and grow their own food. Think about it. It's just the waste and corruption (the real reason for unnecessary wars) we need to work on.
IraK
Whether I agree with someone's views or not, I'm always willing to salute a well-researched and well-reasoned argument or essay. My Neo-con's helmet's off once again to Jim Quinn.
One reason I especially like this site is that Jim Quinn, when he's not typing before he quits swearing or before he starts thinking, sets such a high standard for TBP. Hopefully posters will pick up on Quinn's perfections, pitch out the profanity, and perfect their posts' persuasiveness.
Eric
IraK, stop worrying and tut tutting about swearing while this nation is on fire.
See how your Neo-cons helmet would withstand this police response to a Constitutional gathering in Pittsburg
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2009/sep/25/sonic-cannon-g20-pittsburgh
Makes ya proud! Numbnuts!
Tom Frank
JimQ puts things most eloquently, full of historical wisdom.
Permit me nevertheless add a few simple points:
a) While US aspired to be an empire during the 1910's (it did build a grand fleet of battleships and took Cuba and Philippines, just like the European empires), the dream became reality after WW2.
b) Aided by the Cold War, the military-industrial complex after WW2 took off and proceeded to achieve a size, a force, a momentum of such power that it has ceased to serve the country. Yes, the country. Because it serves the American empire.
c) While voters have a big say in the country, they have no say in the empire. Similarly, while a country is to serve the citizens, the empire is to serve those who controls the imperial ideology and its finance. Just like the British Empire sucking wealth from the American colonies, the American empire suck wealth from citizens within the country as well as from foreign ones. There is no distinction between the two. The empire is a separate entity, with a life of its own. And it is not constraint by such things as Constitution. Those who works for the empire similarly are not constraint. Witness the war machine conducting endless wars, the general who never has enough troops, the armament machine producing billion-ton equipment, the finance machine conducting mass plunder, the big biz machine conducting unfettered globalization for unlimited profits. All these are vital to the empire. Why? Because the purpose of the empire is to run the world. Why? Because it can. If you think its because to spread freedom and democracy - consider yourself amazingly stupid.
d) The empire life, however, is that of a cancer. It cannot stop growing, the very act which will destroy it. Every empire in history followed this path. No exception.
Anonymous
"The left wing liberal welfare statists have never come across a program to redistribute wealth from the hard working middle class to the non-working shiftless, lazy uneducated masses, that they didn’t favor."
This is a smokescreen. The truth is that the money from the middle class really goes to the elite powerful rich 1% through these "social programs", which are nothing but handouts and government kickbacks to large corporations hiding as helping the "poor". These kickbacks to large corporations go directly into the pockets of the thieves called CEO's and Executives.
The real class struggle is not with the middle class to the working poor. The real struggle as it always has been in history is between the ruling class of wealthy people who are leaches of society and depend on stealing the wealth created by the majority.
There is no CEO or executive that does anything of real value that creates even 1 tenth of the value of their salary. If we look at proportion of real value created, the factory worker creates much more value than he is paid. The value he isn't paid is what those above steal from him. In essence, heirarchical corporate organizations are all pyramid schemes in that those on top feed off of those below who create real value.
Ed Croker
Jim,
Your facts are very well stated and as true as the needle to the pole. I see no doubt in the direction of our desired journey, only the means, ways, and tools chosen to accomplish it. Whatever you do, never cease making the case for the reinstatement of sound principles in our country here at the Burning Platform, for whether we root out the evil amongst us, or cut it off via divorce, we must not allow the extenguishment of the light of liberty in this otherwise dark world. To paraphrase Ben Franklin; where liberty dwells, there is my country.
Judging from some comments it seems that the spirit of liberty is alive and well, however, we could all use some "boning up" on the concept of limited government. Keep writing and reminding us that when government grows, even for the most worthy goals, liberty shrinks. Usually those "worthy goals" are just a smoke screen for some kind of hidden agenda that does not include freedom or prosperity.
I am updating my site in the next few days/weeks and want to link to yours with your permission. (Campaign for Liberty,Rand Paul for Senate, Peter Schiff for Senate, Ron Paul sites, etc.)
Otherwise, GREAT ARTICLE!
In Freedom,
Ed
Reality
So where does their genocide fit into this?
Face it, the US is corrupt because it has been from day one. Slave owning masons looking out for each other and their own personal wealth!
Nothing has changed, no matter how patriotically you try to pretend it has.
Anonymous
"Sympathy for the favorite Nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification."
Unless of course that country is Israel. Any threat to them will cause a mushroom cloud over Manhattan somehow, because the leaders of said threatening countries must be insane zealots who can't be reasoned with, yet possess magical teleportation powers to transfer nuclear devices... and in fact, I must be anti-semitic for even having a hint of sarcasm in this statement. Bang, zoom, pow, let the propaganda commence! I think I'll cross over the Mexican border illegally & go get a landscaping job before our country implodes...
rennerstump
J.Q, A very on target article. How to revive the Constitutional form with limited government in place is the problem ?? Conrad Lacy, publisher of the Freedom News Digest, thought we had lost it back in 1985. I did not know the "way" to recapture our original freedom, at that time. I know the "WAY" now. The Fed Audit will expose the massive crimes committed since 1913 (if it really does a thorough AUDIT and inspection of the gold "at Fort Knox"}?? JQ's article is a working basis to rally the public to the Constitution,(Not the "right or left", as that phrase is bank-commie-socialist "double speak" = the bankers OWN right and left! The people must be converted by faith back into the "People of the Constitution". This is a task that can be done rapidly if properly implimented> Let us begin!! RS What is the problem.= the answer!!
DavosSherman
The colonel (retired) who lives up the road from me I thought told me McCain was a "reverse" ace as in he crashed 5 planes. In fact, I've heard the quote: "When he became a POW the Navy saved a ton of money." I have never heard that 5 patients perished under Dr. Paul.
The difference between competence and being an absolute and utter moron. As an ex-airline captain with 15,000 hours I can assure you that flying is NOT rocket science. 5 planes? Pleeeeaaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
SSS
Except for your comments on John McCain's military service, Jim, this is possibly your best and most provocative post. Your homage to and respect for George Washington is first rate.
Pop quiz on your list of 50 combat operations which have violated the U.S. Constitution.
First Question. One of the countries targetted for military action was ruled by a ruthless military dictator who was actively and personally involved in moving multi-ton shipments of cocaine into the U.S. on behalf of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia. The country has a resource which is of critical interest not only to U.S. commerce, but international commerce as well. The dictator organized and sanctioned repeated "spontaneous" attacks on the U.S. embassy causing hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage and injured several diplomatic personnel. He also permitted his defense personnel to attack U.S. servicemen (one was killed) and rape several U.S. female citizens, including two wives of U.S. servicemen. None of these crimes were ever pursued by the dictator's thugocracy. Through military intervention, the dictator was captured and extradicted to the U.S., convicted of drug trafficking, and is still in a federal prison in Florida. Name the dictator, resource (hint: not oil), and country.
Second Question. Keeping in mind that our military intervention to overthrow and capture the dictator was an operation withheld from the public until it was launched, can you please provide an alternative "non-interventionist solution" to this situation?
JimQ
SSS
Sometimes I can't help myself. I hold a grudge against McCain for his disgusting display of contempt towards Ron Paul during the debates. I read his book and liked him until I saw the way he treated Paul. That was a window into his true character. I lost respect for him at that point and lost complete respect when he voted for the Mega Bank Bailout. He is dead to me.
There were actually 80 instances and I eliminated 30 because they appeared to be defensive in nature to me. It is uninteresting to me to get into the minutia of every military operation listed. That is not the point. The point is that we have had 5 major wars since WWII and Congress has not carried out their Constitutional Duty to make a declaration of War. Allowing the President complete control over the use of the military is a recipe for Dictatorship.
SSS
Buckhed and csiegner: your responses to my post above were, well, quite shallow. You both ignored a key question in the pop quiz: name the critical resource involved. It was the Panama Canal. Would you like to try again and tell me how a "non-interventionist" solution would handle the problem? And don't forget to factor in valid treaties which come into play.
SSS
Jim: I lost respect for McCain as a politician years ago. I will never support him for public office, but his character and courage as a POW are, in my view, unassailable. It's that simple. I will respond to the second part of your reply later. SSS
SSS
Jim said: "It is uninteresting to me to get into the minutia of every military operation listed. That is not the point. The point is that we have had 5 major wars since WWII and Congress has not carried out their Constitutional Duty to make a declaration of War. Allowing the President complete control over the use of the military is a recipe for Dictatorship."
I deliberately picked out a military operation (the invasion of Panama to overthrow Manuel Noriega) that does not conveniently fit the non-interventionist policy of Ron Paul and his followers, nor would it have been prudent, unless you wanted the number of U.S. casualties to absolutely skyrocket, to have gone to Congress and ask for a declaration of war. The year of the invasion was 1989, and according to a signed treaty, the Panama Canal was to be turned over to Panama in 1999, which in fact it was. The U.S. saw a legitimate and growing grave threat posed by Noriega and his thuggish Panamanian Defense Forces to the security of the Canal, which remained U.S. property, and to U.S. forces stationed in Panama. The Canal was, and remains, a valuable global resource, and the U.S. did not want the Canal to fall into the hands of an international drug trafficker and his increasingly outlaw regime. In my view, the invasion was self-defense and had plenty of sound rationale to back it up.
I would be extremely interested in how President Ron Paul would have dealt with Panama in 1989. It would have been a huge test for the non-interventionist policy he espouses today. My guess is that he would have done exactly what Bush Sr. did.
Anonymous
It's up to us, folks. Our country sinks or swims based on our willingness to pay attention and remove those who fail us from public office. Pay attention to what they do, not what they say to make us feel good. The Constitution is only as good as the people following it. Our basic attitude of grabbing as much as we can get for ourselves is what ultimately screws us all. A few folks at the top are very good at it. Don't complain about our situation if you feel everyone has a moral right to grab as much wealth as possible and keep it. If you're the one who's being taxed too heavily, you're just one of the current losers in that game (hard to admit, but it's true). We're not going socialistic folks -- this is corrupt capitalism at it's finest. Those of you who feel that taxes are "theft" are simply the victims of others who are better at "working hard and keeping their money" than you are. Where the hell do you think all the money and assets the very rich have comes from? It comes from all of us. Don't get me wrong. I believe capitalism is a good thing But it needs to be kept in check to avoid extreme concentration of wealth. I also find it hard to believe that the majority of Americans don't mind if the biggest losers in this game live in absolute poverty or even die because of it. I suppose they deserve it for being so stupid, lazy, immoral, etc.... I admit I sometimes feel the same way, but it just doesn't seem right for some reason. I must be immoral to have sympathy for others.
Danielle B.
great piece. I really enjoyed it except for the "rag head" comment.
jdison
I have to admit, watching the news has turned into the evening comedy hour. They say the most ridiculous and absurd things, that you just have to laugh. Frankly I prefer revolution by peaceful means, and yet the difficult fact is that we have some very determined men and women serving in high places, determined to have things their way.
Anonymous
I must say, I am enjoying the fall of the Amerikan empire immensely - profiting from it too!
Am also looking forward to the continued destruction of the currency (virtually a guarantee as a fn of debt & entitlements).
My greatest wonder is how long the fall will take and how deep a hole we will dig ourselves into.
Got gold?
BlackRockBurner
The American Republic will continue to decay until we destroy and replace the Republican Party. They are jut another head of the Hydra that is the Political Class.
They have no ideology and will throw the Constitution under the bus when it is expedient.
So called 'conservatives' are really no different than Democrats....they just want Government to interfere in your life in different ways.
The truly sick part is that 'conservatives' actually believe they are on the side of Freedom. They believe their own bullshit.
ashok singh
american need to retold the story of mahabhartaagreat epicfrom india. karauvasinstead of warning thousandof timesof there wrong doingdidnt listen.all efforts of lord krishnawere also in vain. finaly war of maharbharta happend. arjuna had to killhis own blood relatives.intially arjuna wasreluctantto go on war aganst his own relatives.krishnafinally guides arujana and convinces him thatb evil of karuvashas reached point of no return.only option is to killthem.same the case of your karuravas the military instrial complax,investment bankers,the club(which forced yestlin to make putin as pesident of russia)legal system etc. youhave great guide ron paul your krishna and you all pandvas james , martin amstrong, larouche , william engdhal, bob chapman,etc must withoutany hestation start killing this kauravas. no enquiry or revolt is going to work. ron paul muststart telling the storyof mahabhartaand geeta becauseanything indiantoday attarctthe attention of american people immediately just remember obamas warning of children in indiaand china are studying.this story wil defenately convince american to eliminatethis kauravas. well from where will you get wisdomthen oldest living civilizationonearth. just remember we are only country in the world which didnt develop on slavery wealth.we didnt have much gold yet we have forty thousand tons of gold reservestoday. in terms of dollars it ius almost equal to our gdp. our private debt is just thirtyhreepercent of gdp. if you take inventory valve than inventorythen debt will benegative.morever americans must immediatelyimplenment yogic and ayurvedic reform. this will bring down the health care expenditure by atleast one trillion dollarswithin two years. healtcare expenditure is arbitrage .avilable in american economy. will be writing one good articleon the topic hope so james post it on the website. in last i would only say youngest nation on earth must learn from oldest civilization on earth.
United-Socialist-Front
Hello my friend: wow what a great article. And even though i am socialist, and I think you might be democratic-libertarian, i believe that you are right. USA needs a second revolution, at least an electoral revolution like many other nations today are having, where traditional political parties are collapsing, and alternative political parties to the corporate traditional political parties are rising, like in Ecuador, Bolivia, Venezuela. So I believe that the USA might experience the rise of a third populist democratic third party as an option to the Democrats and Republicans who have morphed into a party for the rich, and have turned USA into a sort of Monarchy and Feudalism for the rich, instead of a Republican Humanist Democracy with wealth for all americans, not for the few elites. Good luck and remember that USA needs a United Front !!
United-Socialist-Front
MY PERSONAL THEORY ON BUSH, OBAMA, CLINTON AND MOST U.S. PRESIDENTS IS NOT THAT THEY ARE EVIL, BUT THEIR MAIN PROBLEM IS LACK OF BALLS, AND LACK OF WILL TO POWER TO FIGHT AGAINST THE CORPORATE ELITES
So i think that one of the major problems of most political leaders in both the right and the left is that they don't have the necessary strength of courage and will to power to confront the real government (Corporations and rich people). Even Bush. Bush was not really evil, but weak to confront the real rulers of USA, and that's why he did all that he did (The illegal wars, 9-11, Patriot Act, torture, etc.)
Here is a review of "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" which is a manifesto to gain strength and courage:
A superman doesn't have any thing to do with political, military and abusive power, like the Nazis. Nazism and Fascism are elements of capitalism, of corporate exploitation, abuse, racism, chauvinism and evil, they twisted Nietzsches writtings (Specially Nietzsche's sister who was a Nazi).
But really, a great man, a Superman (Ubermensch) is this type of revolutionary, rebel, anarchist, totally free individual who has no laws, and authorities over him, he also doesn't accept the morality and conservative laws of the current regimen, in fact he tries to influence others by breaking the old values in order to teach to other members of his society his new values. A superman would be a revolutionary reformer of new laws, new values.
My friend, you can find out more about Nietzsche's superman in the book "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" which even could be used in today's United States, a country oppressed by 2 corporate capitalist parties (Democrats and Republicans) and where US citizens feel that there is literally no hope, no liberation out of this hell of our kleptocratic Democrat-Republican 1 party monster.
The main thesis of Thus Spoke Zarathustra is the fact that humans have literally 2 options in this existance, either to accept the current reality and values and succumb to a state of passive-nihilist resignation, or to be an architect of our own destiny, inserted in this reality as a active-tragic nihilist (A destroyer of old values, and creators of new values)
Here is a short review of Thus Spoke Zarathustra, one of Nietzsche's best works about the superman:
http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/zara.htm
Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra is probably his most famous work as well as being the work least popular among readers. This is probably partially because it is written in fictional form. Zarathustra is well designed to frustrate twentieth century conservative bourgeoise philosophy of the analytic tradition, which seeks conceptual clarity at the expense of rhetorical form, indeed often insisting on the separation between a concept and the vehicle of its expression. Moreover, the utilization of the work by the Nazi war effort did little to improve the books reception in the Anglo-American world.
The book is philosophically interesting, in part because it does employ literary tropes and genres to philosophical effect. Zarathustra makes frequent use of parody, particularly of the Platonic dialogues and the New Testament. This strategy immediately places Zarathustra on a par with Socrates and Christ--and as a clear alternative to them. The erudite allusions to works spanning the Western philosophical and literary traditions also play a philosophical role, for they both reveal Nietzsche's construct of the tradition he inherited and flag points at which he views it as problematic.
Much of the book consists of Zarathustra's speeches on philosophical themes. These often obscure the plotline of the book. The book does involve a plot, however, which includes sections in which Zarathustra is "off-stage," in private reflection, and some in which he seems extremely distressed about the way his teaching and his life are going. Zarathustra attempts to instruct the crowds and the occasional higher independent man that he encounters in the book; but his most important teaching is his education of the reader, accomplished through demonstrative means. Zarathustra teaches by showing.
Zarathustra stands in he tradition of the German Bildungsroman, in which a character's development toward spiritual maturity is chronicled. Zarathustra can be seen as a paradigm for the modern, spiritually sensitive individual, one who grapples with nihilism, the contemporary crisis in values in the wake of the collapse of the Christian worldview that assigned humanity a clear place in the world.
In the popular imagination, Nietzsche's idea of the Ubermensch is one of his most memorable and significant ideals. However, the concept of the Ubermensch is actually discussed little in the book. The topic is the theme of the first speech in "Zarathustra's Prologue," which he presents to a crowd gathered for a circus. The audience interprets Zarathustra as a circus barker and the speech as an introduction to a performance by a tightrope walker. The concept is mentioned recurrently in Part I as something of a refrain to Zarathustra's speeches. But the word Ubermensch rarely occurs after that.
Additionally, the notion of the Ubermensch is presented in more imagistic than explanatory terms. The Ubermensch, according to Zarathustra, is continually experimental, willing to risk all for the enhancement of humanity. The Ubermensch aspires to greatness, but Zarathustra does not formulate any more specific characterization of what constitutes the enhancement of humanity or greatness. He does, however, contrast the Ubermensch to the last man, the human type whose sole desire is personal comfort and happiness. Such a person is the "last man" quite literally, incapable of the desire that is required to create beyond oneself in any form, including that of having children.
Zarathustra's opening speech, besides proposing the Ubermensch as the ideal for humanity also places emphasis on this world as opposed to any future world. In particular, Zarathustra urges that human beings reassess the value of their own bodies, indeed their embodiment. For too long, dreaming of the afterlife, Western humanity has treated the body as a source of sin and error. Zarathustra, in contrast, insists that the body is the ground of all meaning and knowledge, and that health and strength should be recognized and sought as virtues which is related to Marxism and Feuerbarch's slogan of "You are what you eat" (Remember how right-wingers despise reality, economics, and physiology)
Another prominent theme in Zarathustra is its emphasis on the relative importance of will. In part, this emphasis follows Schopenhauer in claiming that will is more fundamental to human beings than knowledge. However, Nietzsche stresses the will's attempt to enhance its power, whereas he views Schopenhauer as placing greater stress on the will's efforts at self preservation. Nietzsche's famous conception of will to power makes one of its few published appearances in Zarathustra.
Much of the plot of Zarathustra concerns his efforts to formulate his idea of eternal recurrence. At times, the idea possesses him in the form of visions and dreams. At others, he seems reluctant to state it categorically or to accept its implications. During a particularly despairing moment, he shudders at the implication of his doctrine that "the rabble," the bourgeoise people who comprise most of the human race, will also recur. The fact that Zarathustra objects to the recurrence of the rabble is indicative of Nietzsche's preference of a system in which we would be architects of our own destiny. Consistently, Nietzsche and Zarathustra contend that human beings are not equal and clones. Nietzsche objects to the bourgeoise conservative movements of his era in favor of more participative, libertarian and democratic forms of social organization that would place economic-control in the hands of each individual, instead of a few corrupt corporate crooks and burocrats like representative bourgeoise democracies (our current system).
Veteran Patriot
I was enjoying this article until I read the comment criticizing Sen. McCain for "cracking" under torture in Hanoi.
Criticize his policies, poke at his flying record, but please don't have the disrespect to insult his behavior under torture. If anything is shameful, such a comment is.
That comment lost this website a reader.
irongamer
Here is my take on the whole deal. I don't think the problem is government in of itself. It is corrupted government, representatives being bribed and no true representation of the people. This is happening, currently, due to big corporate lobbying and our lame representatives accepting their money. I say it is currently corporate because they are the current entity, in our time, that holds power. Most approaches to fix this issue are completely useless. If we try to create more government to limit corporate power, it doesn't matter because they are paying off the ones that make the rules. If we limit government, there is no initiative by the government to nail down businesses that are preying on the public or breaking laws. The corporations pay the law makers, thus they will not start any initiatives to limit their own power. I think we are at a catch 22. We are damned if we do and we are damned if we don't. Democrats and Republicans both serve the same people, the people that lobby them, the people that buy them. A number of people from the smaller political parties may also be bought, but it should be less since they don't as much sway as the others. A co-worker of mine and I chat about possible solutions from time to time. One idea to limit corporate influence in our government is shorter terms for senators and representatives. Only allow them to run twice, once they have run twice they are out. After "serving" a few terms both senators and representatives seem to only care about getting money to run for next term. No more governing as a job, it should be a service to the country. The problem with this approach is you have to convince an bunch of entrenched people to fire themselves...not likely. Another idea is voting out incumbents. Voting out most or all of the incumbents would take a long time and trying to find someone to vote in that will not sell out is tough. Another idea that has been tossed around is an Article V Convention. This calls together a convention to submit amendments to the constitution. The problem is, once submitted, the amendment follows the same system as all the other submitted amendments. This still runs into the problem of the law makers being sold out. For every step the country takes in the right direction it seems to take 3 or 4 backward. I'm not sure how many more steps back the country can take. A lot of anger and some unrest are building up. A lot of it seems misguided and aimed at whatever random thing makes the news. I don't know if this mess is going to explode into a bigger one. It may take a few years before it really explodes or maybe it will just settle down. It is my hope the people can be rightfully represented again, not just a few corporate cronies at the top. This change needs to be brought about peacefully, I fear it may not.
deb
just a question..
if tomorrow there is another 9 /11, real or false-flag, ignoring that aspect...
what will you do? how will you u react?
will you get your guns out and raid war on another new country or increase preexisting ones...?
what will the answer of America be. I know Ron Paul's answer. He is truly what is defending America's image of being an worthwhile experiment and ideological attempt for liberty and freedom of all good human beings. If not for him, I would believe that America is nothing but a crazy power hungry murdering/raping/pillaging empire.
But the point is, how will the actual America react ? not the politicians but the real individual american who only is bothered about just having a decent comfortable life for himself and his family. ? And how will you guys react? all of you who are very active in this website and any other such websites which stand for the alternative/truthful /whatever-u -wanna-call-them media.
How will YOU react? ..
food for thought....?