RAGINGDEBATE.COM NETWORK AFFILIATE - FACILITATING CITIZEN'S POWERED MEDIA RECOMMENDED AFFILIATE SITE: RAGINGDEBATE.COM

110 Comments

Vote FOR or AGAINST comments below.

Ron Paul is doing what he is doing, for ALL OF US, as did John Adams and Thomas Jefferson.   Most people do what they are doing for themselves.  These three are doing and did do it, for ALL OF US.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous
  • Vote
  • 5
  • 0

“Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”George Washington

George was correct in saying what he said. I only wonder if he was conscious of the fact that this is/was an issue of structure. Hard to say because it's a little like wondering if fish know there is life beyond the paradigm of being submerged in the water. George's comments are a product of the hierarchical paradigm, created with supply driven applications before the advent of the information age.

We're here to create a "rounder" world , free from focal points of power consolidation ...... but by way of the market !

  • Vote
  • 4
  • 0

Excellent article!   And the MSM says we're the Populists!   I think this is probably the antithesis of the Populist movement.     

TheBurningPlatform.com - taxpayer
taxpayer

Hi,

One of the interesting things about the Tea Parties is that so many people make assumptions about what those citizens are angry about. And so the Tea Party participants are really just a projection of the wishes of those who observe them. If I were at a Tea party/tax revolt, this is where my anger would be:

I'm angry that my tax dollars are used to fund illegal and immoral wars [currently Iraq and Afghanistan]. 

I am angry that my tax dollars fund the military industrial complex that makes continued wars necessary in order to keep big corporations profitable.

I'm angry that my tax dollars are being used to pay outrageously immoral salaries to entitled CEOs of private companies who deserve NONE of my money. I don't care whether or not they were in on the original scams.

I'm angry at the bank bailouts - every one of those insolvent private or quasi-private companies should have been in orderly bankruptcies. They are ten thousand times worse than any "welfare queen" in terms of the depth and extent of their entitlement mentalities.

I am angry  that corporate America and the US government are now one and the same entity - corporatism and fascism are the order of the day. Socialism, my ass!

What I support:

A reasonable universal health care for all

We reconfigure Social Security so that it takes care of indigent and poor elderly ONLY which was its original intent

We end EVERY subsidy regardless of whether it is supported by liberals or conservatives

We ban lobbying completely [I have a brilliant substitute plan!]

We have publicly funded elections and have a six week campaign season

We dismantle the Federal Reserve

We bring back Eliot Spitzer to lead the investigations into criminal activity on Wall St/DC. He hung out with prostitutes and pimps; he's EXACTLY the right guy for the job.

We cut military spending by half

And finally, if the Congress wants to vote to go to war, then every single member who supports going to war either has to enlist, or have one of their children or grandchildren enlist. If they won't do that, they can't vote yes to go to war. NO exceptions.

Bye, y'all.

  • Vote
  • 8
  • 0

We added the ability to send the articles here from TBP far and wide. Note this ability at the end of every article. I'll make a prediction because I can measure everything. I'll wager that 4% of you will actually forward the articles. By 2012, that number will reach 8%. Historic trend tells us that economic pain is the catalyst of change (Not the lip service President Obama was stumping at during election time).

It is estimated that less then 10% of the entire population assisted the Revolutionaries. Human nature does not change, the percentages will shake out the same this time as well. I can already tell the 4% number by donations but I'll measure forwards of these articles as well as a general barometer of public sentiment and actions taken. Jim is right, the difference between the two political parties in Washington is like the difference between Coke and Pepsi. The "neo" agenda of left or right is a Cerebeus, two ugly heads and one mutated body.

Cerberus , the three headed dog , guardian of hell in the Sacro Bosco , Parco dei Mostri , Bomarzo , stock photo
 

Four years from the start of depressionary numbers (Q4 2008) result in voter revolution. This is the 4th era of government/banking collusion (1810's, 1870's, 1910's and current). Voting out the bum in your own back yard is voter revolution. Reelection ratios of 95% exist when times are good. They drop to 65%-70% four years after the start of depressions.

We'll try it the peaceful way and arm Patriots of all political spectrums with blogging sites and attempt to reach consenus and make political change in 2012. If that fails, government will fire the first shots in attempting to collect the increased taxes amoungst a population that can no longer afford to live. Just like the first American Revolution. Decide to be a part of history, rather then biting your nails off hoping someone else will become the next George Washington. Many have asked me or Jim how to help. Forwarding the articles is a good start which we have just  made a lot easier.

Wow, JQ.  That is a real shot across the bow.  This is an excellent bit of writing you have pulled together here.  I found myself coming to attention and getting ready to snap off a salute while reading. 

In the end, though, I can't agree with the part about not being able to change our predicament through the vote.  My opinion is that it is never too late as long as we have the vote.  I understand where you're coming from, and I really don't wish to argue so much as state my opinion.  I still think we can do this, and this is the best chance I've seen to get it done in my almost 50 years of breathing.  I'm not ready to say Ron can't get elected.  We must continue to prepare the ground, and the ground is as fertile as I can ever remember seeing it. 

I too get sick of defending the constitution.  It is a smart, intelligent gathering of the best of governing principles ever devised by humans.  It is not perfect - couldn't be - but it is as about as close as humans can get. 

An outstanding and inspiring article, Jim.  This is now one of my favorites from you. 

TheBurningPlatform.com - frances snoot
frances snoot
  • Vote
  • 9
  • 0
We could all pass muster at history class, but unless Americans realistically access what is going on in the world today our efforts to reinstate a Republic will be ineffectual. Obama is sitting head of a NWO system: Obama sits for the elite, not Americans, as head of the UN security council. The sdr-managed systemic collapse will be orderly for those with the means to pay the tyrannical police state for protection. The enemy of the statist machine is every common person in every country, not just America. Our country may have legal documents, but the military is now serving under NATO jurisdiction, the police serve Federal forces, and the people support that which provides for personal advancement. The ICC is working to destroy the sovereignty of every nation through the passage of the ICC Treaty which will make defunct British common law. Now is the time to fight the forces summoned to do the will of the international bankers operating through the jurisdiction of the IMF/BIS elite. Why are we focused on an old paradigm when the new paradigm noose is about our necks? There won't be any America post collapse unless the men (where are they?) summon their courage NOW and get real.
TheBurningPlatform.com - bill_flinn
bill_flinn
  • Vote
  • 3
  • 0

Dear Jim,

I would like to draw your readers' attention to an audio interview with Eric King at King World News (http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast_Gold+/Entries/2009/9/25_GATA.html) in which he talks with Bill Murphy and Chris Powell of GATA over this very topic of Federal Reserve secret activity in the markets and the "Audit the Fed" bill now before Congress.

This is a powerful interview; I for one was very impressed, and I have taken the liberty of summarizing the points made in the interview and posting them on my own site at http://goldsurvivalguide.co.nz/

Best,

 

Bill Flinn

TheBurningPlatform.com - frances snoot
frances snoot
  • Vote
  • 5
  • 0
All political players and any media players gaining air space are not to be trusted: they are invested in a dollar-based system which was itself corrupt from the inception of the Bretton Woods agreement. The new system is operating out of regulations decided upon by the elite who have placed Mario Draghi at the head of the Financial Stability Board in Basel/BIS, and by the Basel Committee. If you have not researched the Basel ii banking pillars to be enacted worldwide, then you have no idea what is going on. The operative players are functioning from an EU/London base. Please do not confuse American sovereignty with the players in Washington or any congressmen. These people are sold out. Any real protest should focus on the G20 members (not the Political leaders, but the central banking heads, the IMF, the BIS, and their operative units). The US Treasury is defunct, has been defunct: please refer to the IMF instead. Waving flags will mean nothing. Our rights as citizens were sold before the world wars.
TheBurningPlatform.com - frances snoot
frances snoot
  • Vote
  • 3
  • 0
One last thing: understand this. Real money is what the BIS decides it is. The BIS owns the dollar as reserve currency and is set to collapse the dollar and move away from all paper currency. How will there be 'real money' then? Better to use the gold stored NOW as a source of barter and derail the orderly currency collapse then hope away that the elite in control will blink.
TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous
  • Vote
  • 7
  • 6

No one has a moral right to health care, or any other welfare benefit from the government, paid for by others. People in real need should rely on private charity.

Better try to revive the Articles of Confederation!

TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous

Another otherwise useful column tainted and made unforwardable to intelligent  associates by its inclusion of easily verifyable  false information or hyperbole.

Several of the 50 military actions listed were not invasions, wars, or even military action.   Some were clear defensive acts (planes shot down in Libyan gulf) which are completely constitutional, like the mission they were on or not, others are purely intelligence actions, some are ally-training missions, others are CIA led "assistance", which while ambiguous, is certainly not as you clearly claim "Americans sent into battle".  

Let go of your ego and let a   historian edit your column if you aren't willing to put in the work.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Indian
Indian

 Wonderful Article, as usual, Mr.Quinn!!

I am not an American. I am an Indian. The more I come to know about the American Constituition the more I am amazed at the tremendrous foresight & immense wisdom of your founding fathers. No wonder that your country is (should I say was?) the greatest nation that this world has ever seen. It definitely evokes envy when I compare it to our Indian constituition which is a sorry re-hashed piece of work from the already sorry British Constituition. 

 

It really is a work of Art! The increasing violation of this work of Art is surely very unfortunate for the world at large. 

 

TheBurningPlatform.com - Eric
Eric
  • Vote
  • 4
  • 2

It's obvious that Anonymous is really in tune with the Constitution.

" Some were clear defensive acts (planes shot down in Libyan gulf) which are completely constitutional, like the mission they were on or not, others are purely intelligence actions, some are ally-training missions, others are CIA led "assistance", which while ambiguous, is certainly not as you clearly claim "Americans sent into battle".  

Gee!  I feel better knowing all this. 

TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous

 JQ, I get it. However, your articles seem to attract the ignorant "Hate the Government" zealots. Why is that? The Constitution is all about governing the country. I suppose everyone wants to pump water from a well, drive on dirt roads, and grow their own food. Think about it. It's just the waste and corruption (the real reason for unnecessary wars) we need to work on.

TheBurningPlatform.com - IraK
IraK
  • Vote
  • 6
  • 2

Whether I agree with someone's views or not, I'm always willing to salute a well-researched and well-reasoned argument or essay. My Neo-con's helmet's off once again to Jim Quinn.

One reason I especially like this site is that Jim Quinn, when he's not typing before he quits swearing or before he starts thinking, sets such a high standard for TBP. Hopefully posters will pick up on Quinn's perfections, pitch out the profanity, and perfect their posts' persuasiveness.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Eric
Eric
  • Vote
  • 5
  • 2

IraK, stop worrying and tut tutting about swearing while this nation is on fire. 

See how your Neo-cons helmet would withstand this police response to a Constitutional gathering in Pittsburg

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2009/sep/25/sonic-cannon-g20-pittsburgh

Makes ya proud!  Numbnuts!

TheBurningPlatform.com - Tom Frank
Tom Frank

JimQ puts things most eloquently, full of historical wisdom.

Permit me nevertheless add a few simple points:

a) While US aspired to be an empire during the 1910's (it did build a grand fleet of battleships and took Cuba and Philippines, just like the European empires), the dream became reality after WW2.

b) Aided by the Cold War, the military-industrial complex after WW2 took off and proceeded to achieve a size, a force, a momentum of such power that it has ceased to serve the country. Yes, the country. Because it serves the American empire.

c) While voters have a big say in the country, they have no say in the empire. Similarly, while a country is to serve the citizens, the empire is to serve those who controls the imperial ideology and its finance. Just like the British Empire sucking wealth from the American colonies, the American empire suck wealth from citizens within the country as well as from foreign ones. There is no distinction between the two. The empire is a separate entity, with a life of its own. And it is not constraint by such things as Constitution. Those who works for the empire similarly are not constraint. Witness the war machine conducting endless wars, the general who never has enough troops, the armament machine producing billion-ton equipment, the finance machine conducting mass plunder, the big biz machine conducting unfettered globalization for unlimited profits. All these are vital to the empire. Why? Because the purpose of the empire is to run the world. Why? Because it can. If you think its because to spread freedom and democracy - consider yourself amazingly stupid.

d) The empire life, however, is that of a cancer. It cannot stop growing, the very act which will destroy it. Every empire in history followed this path. No exception.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous

"The left wing liberal welfare statists have never come across a program to redistribute wealth from the hard working middle class to the non-working shiftless, lazy uneducated masses, that they didn’t favor."

This is a smokescreen. The truth is that the money from the middle class really goes to the elite powerful rich 1% through these "social programs", which are nothing but handouts and government kickbacks to large corporations hiding as helping the "poor". These kickbacks to large corporations go directly into the pockets of the thieves called CEO's and Executives.

The real class struggle is not with the middle class to the working poor. The real struggle as it always has been in history is between the ruling class of wealthy people who are leaches of society and depend on stealing the wealth created by the majority.

There is no CEO or executive that does anything of real value that creates even 1 tenth of the value of their salary. If we look at proportion of real value created, the factory worker creates much more value than he is paid. The value he isn't paid is what those above steal from him. In essence, heirarchical corporate organizations are all pyramid schemes in that those on top feed off of those below who create real value.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Ed Croker
Ed Croker
  • Vote
  • 3
  • 0

Jim,

Your facts are very well stated and as true as the needle to the pole. I see no doubt in the direction of our desired journey, only the means, ways, and tools chosen to accomplish it. Whatever you do, never cease making the case for the reinstatement of sound principles in our country here at the Burning Platform, for whether we root out the evil amongst us, or cut it off via divorce, we must not allow  the extenguishment of the light of liberty in this otherwise dark world. To paraphrase Ben Franklin; where liberty dwells, there is my country.

Judging from some comments it seems that the spirit of liberty is alive and well, however, we could all use some "boning up" on the concept of limited government. Keep writing and reminding us that when government grows, even for the most worthy goals, liberty shrinks. Usually those "worthy goals" are just a smoke screen for some kind of hidden agenda that does not include freedom or prosperity.

I am updating my site in the next few days/weeks and want to link to yours with your permission. (Campaign for Liberty,Rand Paul for Senate, Peter Schiff for Senate, Ron Paul sites, etc.)

Otherwise, GREAT ARTICLE!

In Freedom,

Ed

TheBurningPlatform.com - Reality
Reality
  • Vote
  • 2
  • 9

So where does their genocide fit into this?

Face it, the US is corrupt because it has been from day one. Slave owning masons looking out for each other and their own personal wealth!

Nothing has changed, no matter how patriotically you try to pretend it has.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous
  • Vote
  • 5
  • 1

"Sympathy for the favorite Nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification."

Unless of course that country is Israel.  Any threat to them will cause a mushroom cloud over Manhattan somehow, because the leaders of said threatening countries must be insane zealots who can't be reasoned with, yet possess magical teleportation powers to transfer nuclear devices... and in fact, I must be anti-semitic for even having a hint of sarcasm in this statement.  Bang, zoom, pow, let the propaganda commence!  I think I'll cross over the Mexican border illegally & go get a landscaping job before our country implodes...

TheBurningPlatform.com - rennerstump
rennerstump
  • Vote
  • 2
  • 0

   J.Q,  A very on target article. How to revive the Constitutional form with limited government in place is the problem ?? Conrad Lacy, publisher of the Freedom News Digest, thought we had lost it back in 1985.  I did not know the "way" to recapture our original freedom, at that time. I know the "WAY" now. The Fed Audit will expose the massive crimes committed since 1913 (if it really does a thorough AUDIT and inspection of the gold "at Fort Knox"}??  JQ's article is a working basis to rally the public to the Constitution,(Not the "right or left", as that phrase is bank-commie-socialist "double speak" = the bankers OWN right and left! The people must be converted by faith back into the "People of the Constitution". This  is a task that can be done rapidly if properly implimented> Let us begin!! RS  What is the problem.= the answer!!

TheBurningPlatform.com - DavosSherman
DavosSherman
  • Vote
  • 4
  • 1

The colonel (retired) who lives up the road from me I thought told me McCain was a "reverse" ace as in he crashed 5 planes. In fact, I've heard the quote: "When he became a POW the Navy saved a ton of money." I have never heard that 5 patients perished under Dr. Paul.

The difference between competence and being an absolute and utter moron. As an ex-airline captain with 15,000 hours I can assure you that flying is NOT rocket science. 5 planes? Pleeeeaaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

  • Vote
  • 0
  • 1

Except for your comments on John McCain's military service, Jim, this is possibly your best and most provocative post.  Your homage to and respect for George Washington is first rate.

Pop quiz on your list of 50 combat operations which have violated the U.S. Constitution.

First Question.  One of the countries targetted for military action was ruled by a ruthless military dictator who was actively and personally involved in moving multi-ton shipments of cocaine into the U.S. on behalf of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia.  The country has a resource which is of critical interest not only to U.S. commerce, but international commerce as well.  The dictator organized and sanctioned repeated "spontaneous" attacks on the U.S. embassy causing hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage and injured several diplomatic personnel.  He also permitted his defense personnel to attack U.S. servicemen (one was killed) and rape several U.S. female citizens, including two wives of U.S. servicemen.  None of these crimes were ever pursued by the dictator's thugocracy.  Through military intervention, the dictator was captured and extradicted to the U.S., convicted of drug trafficking, and is still in a federal prison in Florida.  Name the dictator, resource (hint: not oil), and country.

Second Question.  Keeping in mind that our military intervention to overthrow and capture the dictator was an operation withheld from the public until it was launched, can you please provide an alternative "non-interventionist solution" to this situation? 

  • Vote
  • 7
  • 0

SSS

Sometimes I can't help myself. I hold a grudge against McCain for his disgusting display of contempt towards Ron Paul during the debates. I read his book and liked him until I saw the way he treated Paul. That was a window into his true character. I lost respect for him at that point and lost complete respect when he voted for the Mega Bank Bailout. He is dead to me.

There were actually 80 instances and I eliminated 30 because they appeared to be defensive in nature to me. It is uninteresting to me to get into the minutia of every military operation listed. That is not the point. The point is that we have had 5 major wars since WWII and Congress has not carried out their Constitutional Duty to make a declaration of War. Allowing the President complete control over the use of the military is a recipe for Dictatorship.

  • Vote
  • 0
  • 0

Buckhed and csiegner: your responses to my post above were, well, quite shallow.  You both ignored a key question in the pop quiz: name the critical resource involved.  It was the Panama Canal.  Would you like to try again and tell me how a "non-interventionist" solution would handle the problem?  And don't forget to factor in valid treaties which come into play.

  • Vote
  • 2
  • 0

Jim: I lost respect for McCain as a politician years ago.  I will never support him for public office, but his character and courage as a POW are, in my view, unassailable.  It's that simple.  I will respond to the second part of your reply later.  SSS

  • Vote
  • 0
  • 0

Jim said: "It is uninteresting to me to get into the minutia of every military operation listed. That is not the point. The point is that we have had 5 major wars since WWII and Congress has not carried out their Constitutional Duty to make a declaration of War. Allowing the President complete control over the use of the military is a recipe for Dictatorship."

I deliberately picked out a military operation (the invasion of Panama to overthrow Manuel Noriega) that does not conveniently fit the non-interventionist policy of Ron Paul and his followers, nor would it have been prudent, unless you wanted the number of U.S. casualties to absolutely skyrocket, to have gone to Congress and ask for a declaration of war.  The year of the invasion was 1989, and according to a signed treaty, the Panama Canal was to be turned over to Panama in 1999, which in fact it was.  The U.S. saw a legitimate and growing grave threat posed by Noriega and his thuggish Panamanian Defense Forces to the security of the Canal, which remained U.S. property, and to U.S. forces stationed in Panama.  The Canal was, and remains, a valuable global resource, and the U.S. did not want the Canal to fall into the hands of an international drug trafficker and his increasingly outlaw regime.  In my view, the invasion was self-defense and had plenty of sound rationale to back it up.

I would be extremely interested in how President Ron Paul would have dealt with Panama in 1989.  It would have been a huge test for the non-interventionist policy he espouses today.  My guess is that he would have done exactly what Bush Sr. did.

   

TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous
  • Vote
  • 2
  • 0

 It's up to us, folks. Our country sinks or swims based on our willingness to pay attention and remove those who fail us from public office. Pay attention to what they do, not what they say to make us feel good. The Constitution is only as good as the people following it. Our basic attitude of grabbing as much as we can get for ourselves is what ultimately screws us all. A few folks at the top are very good at it. Don't complain about our situation if you feel everyone has a moral right to grab as much wealth as possible and keep it. If you're the one who's being taxed too heavily, you're just one of the current losers in that game (hard to admit, but it's true). We're not going socialistic folks -- this is corrupt capitalism at it's finest. Those of you who feel that taxes are "theft" are simply the victims of others who are better at "working hard and keeping their money" than you are. Where the hell do you think all the money and assets the very rich have comes from? It comes from all of us. Don't get me wrong. I believe capitalism is a good thing  But it needs to be kept in check to avoid extreme concentration of wealth. I also find it hard to believe that the majority of Americans don't mind if the biggest losers in this game live in absolute poverty or even die because of it. I suppose they deserve it for being so stupid, lazy, immoral, etc.... I admit I sometimes feel the same way, but it just doesn't seem right for some reason. I must be immoral to have sympathy for others.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Danielle B.
Danielle B.
  • Vote
  • 1
  • 0

great piece. I really enjoyed it except for the "rag head" comment.

TheBurningPlatform.com - jdison
jdison
  • Vote
  • 1
  • 0

I have to admit, watching the news has turned into the evening comedy hour. They say the most ridiculous and absurd things, that you just have to laugh. Frankly I prefer revolution by peaceful means, and yet the difficult fact is that we have some very determined men and women serving in high places, determined to have things their way.

TheBurningPlatform.com - Anonymous
Anonymous
  • Vote
  • 0
  • 0

 I must say, I am enjoying the fall of the Amerikan empire immensely - profiting from it too!

Am also looking forward to the continued destruction of the currency (virtually a guarantee as a fn of debt & entitlements).

My greatest wonder is how long the fall will take and how deep a hole we will dig ourselves into.

Got gold?

  • Vote
  • 1
  • 0

 The American Republic will continue to decay until we destroy and replace the Republican Party. They are jut another head of the Hydra that is the Political Class. 

They have no ideology and will throw the Constitution under the bus when it is expedient. 

So called 'conservatives' are really no different than Democrats....they just want Government to interfere in your life in different ways. 

The truly sick part is that 'conservatives' actually believe they are on the side of Freedom. They believe their own bullshit. 

TheBurningPlatform.com - ashok singh
ashok singh
  • Vote
  • 2
  • 0

american need to retold the story of mahabhartaagreat epicfrom india. karauvasinstead of warning thousandof timesof there wrong doingdidnt listen.all efforts of lord krishnawere also in vain. finaly war of maharbharta happend. arjuna had to killhis own blood relatives.intially arjuna wasreluctantto go on war aganst his own relatives.krishnafinally guides arujana and convinces him thatb evil of karuvashas reached point of no return.only option is to killthem.same the case of your karuravas the military instrial complax,investment bankers,the club(which forced yestlin to make putin as pesident of russia)legal system etc. youhave great guide ron paul your krishna and you all pandvas james , martin amstrong, larouche , william engdhal, bob chapman,etc must withoutany hestation start killing this kauravas. no enquiry or revolt is going to work. ron paul muststart telling the storyof mahabhartaand geeta becauseanything indiantoday attarctthe attention of american people immediately just remember obamas warning of children in indiaand china are studying.this story wil defenately convince american to eliminatethis kauravas. well from where will you get wisdomthen oldest living civilizationonearth. just remember we are only country in the world which didnt develop on slavery wealth.we didnt have much gold yet we have forty thousand tons of gold reservestoday. in terms of dollars it ius almost equal to our gdp. our private debt is just thirtyhreepercent of gdp. if you take inventory valve than inventorythen debt will benegative.morever americans must immediatelyimplenment yogic and ayurvedic reform. this will bring down the health care expenditure by atleast one trillion dollarswithin two years. healtcare expenditure is arbitrage .avilable in american economy. will be writing one good articleon the topic hope so james post it on the website. in last i would only say youngest nation on earth must learn from oldest civilization on earth.

TheBurningPlatform.com - United-Socialist-Front
United-Socialist-Front
  • Vote
  • 1
  • 2

Hello my friend: wow what a great article.  And even though i am socialist, and I think you might be democratic-libertarian, i believe that you are right. USA needs a second revolution, at least an electoral revolution like many other nations today are having, where traditional political parties are collapsing, and alternative political parties to the corporate traditional political parties are rising, like in Ecuador, Bolivia, Venezuela.  So I believe that the USA might experience the rise of a third populist democratic third party as an option to the Democrats and Republicans who have morphed into a party for the rich, and have turned USA into a sort of Monarchy and Feudalism for the rich, instead of a Republican Humanist Democracy with wealth for all americans, not for the few elites.   Good luck and remember that USA needs a United Front !!

 

 

TheBurningPlatform.com - United-Socialist-Front
United-Socialist-Front
  • Vote
  • 0
  • 0

MY PERSONAL THEORY ON BUSH, OBAMA, CLINTON AND MOST U.S. PRESIDENTS IS NOT THAT THEY ARE EVIL, BUT THEIR MAIN PROBLEM IS LACK OF BALLS, AND LACK OF WILL TO POWER TO FIGHT AGAINST THE CORPORATE ELITES

So i think that one of the major problems of most political leaders in both the right and the left is that they don't have the necessary strength of courage and will to power to confront the real government (Corporations and rich people).  Even Bush.  Bush was not really evil, but weak to confront the real rulers of USA, and that's why he did all that he did (The illegal wars, 9-11, Patriot Act, torture, etc.)

Here is a review of "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" which is a manifesto to gain strength and courage:

A superman doesn't have any thing to do with political, military and abusive power, like the Nazis. Nazism and Fascism are elements of capitalism, of corporate exploitation, abuse, racism, chauvinism and evil, they twisted Nietzsches writtings (Specially Nietzsche's sister who was a Nazi).

But really, a great man, a Superman (Ubermensch) is this type of revolutionary, rebel, anarchist, totally free individual who has no laws, and authorities over him, he also doesn't accept the morality and conservative laws of the current regimen, in fact he tries to influence others by breaking the old values in order to teach to other members of his society his new values. A superman would be a revolutionary reformer of new laws, new values.

My friend, you can find out more about Nietzsche's superman in the book "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" which even could be used in today's United States, a country oppressed by 2 corporate capitalist parties (Democrats and Republicans) and where US citizens feel that there is literally no hope, no liberation out of this hell of our kleptocratic Democrat-Republican 1 party monster.

The main thesis of Thus Spoke Zarathustra is the fact that humans have literally 2 options in this existance, either to accept the current reality and values and succumb to a state of passive-nihilist resignation, or to be an architect of our own destiny, inserted in this reality as a active-tragic nihilist (A destroyer of old values, and creators of new values)

Here is a short review of Thus Spoke Zarathustra, one of Nietzsche's best works about the superman:

http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/zara.htm

Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra is probably his most famous work as well as being the work least popular among readers. This is probably partially because it is written in fictional form. Zarathustra is well designed to frustrate twentieth century conservative bourgeoise philosophy of the analytic tradition, which seeks conceptual clarity at the expense of rhetorical form, indeed often insisting on the separation between a concept and the vehicle of its expression. Moreover, the utilization of the work by the Nazi war effort did little to improve the books reception in the Anglo-American world.

The book is philosophically interesting, in part because it does employ literary tropes and genres to philosophical effect. Zarathustra makes frequent use of parody, particularly of the Platonic dialogues and the New Testament. This strategy immediately places Zarathustra on a par with Socrates and Christ--and as a clear alternative to them. The erudite allusions to works spanning the Western philosophical and literary traditions also play a philosophical role, for they both reveal Nietzsche's construct of the tradition he inherited and flag points at which he views it as problematic.

Much of the book consists of Zarathustra's speeches on philosophical themes. These often obscure the plotline of the book. The book does involve a plot, however, which includes sections in which Zarathustra is "off-stage," in private reflection, and some in which he seems extremely distressed about the way his teaching and his life are going. Zarathustra attempts to instruct the crowds and the occasional higher independent man that he encounters in the book; but his most important teaching is his education of the reader, accomplished through demonstrative means. Zarathustra teaches by showing.

Zarathustra stands in he tradition of the German Bildungsroman, in which a character's development toward spiritual maturity is chronicled. Zarathustra can be seen as a paradigm for the modern, spiritually sensitive individual, one who grapples with nihilism, the contemporary crisis in values in the wake of the collapse of the Christian worldview that assigned humanity a clear place in the world.

In the popular imagination, Nietzsche's idea of the Ubermensch is one of his most memorable and significant ideals. However, the concept of the Ubermensch is actually discussed little in the book. The topic is the theme of the first speech in "Zarathustra's Prologue," which he presents to a crowd gathered for a circus. The audience interprets Zarathustra as a circus barker and the speech as an introduction to a performance by a tightrope walker. The concept is mentioned recurrently in Part I as something of a refrain to Zarathustra's speeches. But the word Ubermensch rarely occurs after that.

Additionally, the notion of the Ubermensch is presented in more imagistic than explanatory terms. The Ubermensch, according to Zarathustra, is continually experimental, willing to risk all for the enhancement of humanity. The Ubermensch aspires to greatness, but Zarathustra does not formulate any more specific characterization of what constitutes the enhancement of humanity or greatness. He does, however, contrast the Ubermensch to the last man, the human type whose sole desire is personal comfort and happiness. Such a person is the "last man" quite literally, incapable of the desire that is required to create beyond oneself in any form, including that of having children.

Zarathustra's opening speech, besides proposing the Ubermensch as the ideal for humanity also places emphasis on this world as opposed to any future world. In particular, Zarathustra urges that human beings reassess the value of their own bodies, indeed their embodiment. For too long, dreaming of the afterlife, Western humanity has treated the body as a source of sin and error. Zarathustra, in contrast, insists that the body is the ground of all meaning and knowledge, and that health and strength should be recognized and sought as virtues which is related to Marxism and Feuerbarch's slogan of "You are what you eat" (Remember how right-wingers despise reality, economics, and physiology)

Another prominent theme in Zarathustra is its emphasis on the relative importance of will. In part, this emphasis follows Schopenhauer in claiming that will is more fundamental to human beings than knowledge. However, Nietzsche stresses the will's attempt to enhance its power, whereas he views Schopenhauer as placing greater stress on the will's efforts at self preservation. Nietzsche's famous conception of will to power makes one of its few published appearances in Zarathustra.

Much of the plot of Zarathustra concerns his efforts to formulate his idea of eternal recurrence. At times, the idea possesses him in the form of visions and dreams. At others, he seems reluctant to state it categorically or to accept its implications. During a particularly despairing moment, he shudders at the implication of his doctrine that "the rabble," the bourgeoise people who comprise most of the human race, will also recur. The fact that Zarathustra objects to the recurrence of the rabble is indicative of Nietzsche's preference of a system in which we would be architects of our own destiny. Consistently, Nietzsche and Zarathustra contend that human beings are not equal and clones. Nietzsche objects to the bourgeoise conservative movements of his era in favor of more participative, libertarian and democratic forms of social organization that would place economic-control in the hands of each individual, instead of a few corrupt corporate crooks and burocrats like representative bourgeoise democracies (our current system).
 

TheBurningPlatform.com - Veteran Patriot
Veteran Patriot
  • Vote
  • 1
  • 2

I was enjoying this article until I read the comment criticizing Sen. McCain for "cracking" under torture in Hanoi.

Criticize his policies, poke at his flying record, but please don't have the disrespect to insult his behavior under torture.    If anything is shameful, such a comment is.

That comment lost this website a reader.

TheBurningPlatform.com - irongamer
irongamer
  • Vote
  • 1
  • 0

  Here is my take on the whole deal.   I don't think the problem is government in of itself. It is corrupted government, representatives being bribed and no true representation of the people.   This is happening, currently, due to big corporate lobbying and our lame representatives accepting their money. I say it is currently corporate because they are the current entity, in our time, that holds power.   Most approaches to fix this issue are completely useless. If we try to create more government to limit corporate power, it doesn't matter because they are paying off the ones that make the rules.   If we limit government, there is no initiative by the government to nail down businesses that are preying on the public or breaking laws. The corporations pay the law makers, thus they will not start any initiatives to limit their own power.   I think we are at a catch 22. We are damned if we do and we are damned if we don't.   Democrats and Republicans both serve the same people, the people that lobby them, the people that buy them. A number of people from the smaller political parties may also be bought, but it should be less since they don't as much sway as the others.   A co-worker of mine and I chat about possible solutions from time to time.   One idea to limit corporate influence in our government is shorter terms for senators and representatives. Only allow them to run twice, once they have run twice they are out. After "serving" a few terms both senators and representatives seem to only care about getting money to run for next term. No more governing as a job, it should be a service to the country. The problem with this approach is you have to convince an bunch of entrenched people to fire themselves...not likely.   Another idea is voting out incumbents. Voting out most or all of the incumbents would take a long time and trying to find someone to vote in that will not sell out is tough.   Another idea that has been tossed around is an Article V Convention. This calls together a convention to submit amendments to the constitution. The problem is, once submitted, the amendment follows the same system as all the other submitted amendments. This still runs into the problem of the law makers being sold out.   For every step the country takes in the right direction it seems to take 3 or 4 backward. I'm not sure how many more steps back the country can take. A lot of anger and some unrest are building up. A lot of it seems misguided and aimed at whatever random thing makes the news.   I don't know if this mess is going to explode into a bigger one. It may take a few years before it really explodes or maybe it will just settle down. It is my hope the people can be rightfully represented again, not just a few corporate cronies at the top. This change needs to be brought about peacefully, I fear it may not.

TheBurningPlatform.com - deb
deb
  • Vote
  • 1
  • 0

just a question..

if tomorrow there is another 9 /11, real or false-flag, ignoring that aspect...

what will you do? how will you u react?

will you get your guns out and raid war on another new country or increase preexisting ones...?

what will the answer of America be. I know Ron Paul's answer. He is truly what is defending America's image of being an worthwhile experiment and ideological attempt for liberty and freedom of all good human beings. If not for him, I would believe that America is nothing but a crazy power hungry murdering/raping/pillaging empire.

But the point is, how will the actual America react ? not the politicians but the real individual american who only is bothered about just having a decent comfortable life for himself and his family. ? And how will you guys react? all of you who are very active in this website and any other such websites which stand for the alternative/truthful /whatever-u -wanna-call-them media.

 

How will YOU react? ..

food for thought....?

Leave a Comment
*If your comment does not appear after clicking submit, try clicking submit again (you do not need to retype your comment).